SynthesisFrontiers in aging neuroscience2022
The Comparative Efficacy of Non-ergot Dopamine Agonist and Potential Risk Factors for Motor Complications and Side Effects From NEDA Use in Early Parkinson's Disease: Evidence From Clinical Trials.
Synthesis in Frontiers in aging neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Neuropharmacological Interventions of Plant Origin for Parkinson's Disease: A Comprehensive Appraisal.Current neuropharmacology · 2025Review
- A study on the effects of the Qihuang Needle therapy on patients with Parkinson's disease.Frontiers in neurology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Non-ergot dopamine agonist (NEDA) are recommended as the first-line treatment for patients with early Parkinson's disease (PD) because of their efficacy in treating PD motor symptoms. However, systematic evaluations of the risk of motor complications induced by NEDA and risk factors potentially associated with motor complications are still lacking. Methods: Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Web of Science were searched for potentially eligible randomized controlled trials. The incidence of motor complications (dyskinesia, motor fluctuations), impulsive-compulsive behaviors and adverse events and clinical disability rating scale (UPDRS) scores were evaluated using standard meta-analytic methods. Metaregression was conducted on the incidence of motor complications (dyskinesia) with treatment duration and NEDA dose as covariates. Results: Patients treated with NEDA had significantly lower UPDRS total scores, motor scores and activity of daily living (ADL) scores than those receiving a placebo (weighted mean difference (WMD) -4.81, 95% CI -6.57 to -3.05; WMD -4.901, 95% CI -7.03 to -2.77; WMD -1.52, 95% CI -2.19 to -0.84, respectively). Patients in the NEDA and NEDA+open Levodopa (LD) groups had lower odds for dyskinesia than patients in the LD group (OR = 0.21, 95% CI: 0.15-0.29; OR = 0.31, 95% CI 0.24-0.42, respectively). Metaregressions indicated that the mean LD dose of the NEDA group increased, and the odds of developing dyskinesia increased ( Conclusion: NEDA therapy reduces motor symptoms and improves ADLs in early PD. The odds of developing motor complications were lower with NEDA than with LD, and dyskinesia increased with increasing LD equivalent dose and was not influenced by NEDA treatment duration. Therefore, long-term treatment with an appropriate dosage of NEDA might be more suitable than LD for early PD patients. Registration: PROSPERO CRD42021287172.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.