Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35527331›Full record

ArticlePharmacoEconomics2022

Modeling the Ex Ante Clinical Real Option Value in an Innovative Therapeutic Area: ALK-Positive Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

Woojung Lee, William B Wong, Stacey Kowal, Louis P Garrison, David L Veenstra, Meng Li

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PharmacoEconomics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Woojung LeeThe CHOICE Institute, School of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4878-9082
William B WongGenentech Inc., South San Francisco, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6054-278X
Stacey KowalGenentech Inc., South San Francisco, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6018-6052
Louis P GarrisonThe CHOICE Institute, School of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9468-4989
David L VeenstraThe CHOICE Institute, School of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0687-0480
Meng LiDepartment of Health Services Research, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030, USA. mli14@mdanderson.org.ORCID 0000-0002-8537-7872
University of Washington · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesA drug that improves survival and/or disease progression can create real option value (ROV)-the additional health gain from future innovations enabled by a longer survival. ROV can be a relevant consideration for both clinical and payer decision-makers. We aimed to estimate the ex ante ROV for first-line (1L) alectinib in anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

methodsWe developed a Markov model to estimate life-years (LYs) and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) gained with 1L alectinib versus 1L crizotinib due to potential future second-line (2L) drugs. Transition probabilities were derived from the phase 3 trial of 1L alectinib and phase 2 trial of 2L brigatinib. We identified drugs being studied in phase 2 and 3 trials in ALK-positive NSCLC at the time of alectinib's 1L approval and projected the likelihood and timing of their arrival and their potential efficacy based on publicly available data.

resultsThe discounted incremental LYs and QALYs for alectinib increased by 12.9% (95% CR - 2.96%, 34.82%; 1.25 vs. 1.11) and 11.2% (95% CR - 2.14%, 29.29%; 1.03 vs. 0.92), respectively, after accounting for ROV. The incremental ROV of alectinib was sensitive to the projected efficacy of future drugs, uptake level, and the hazard ratio of progression-free survival of alectinib (vs. crizotinib).

conclusionsEx ante ROV can be a significant value consideration in therapeutic areas with high levels of expected innovation. The potential efficacy of future drugs and incremental survival with alectinib at the projected time of arrival are important considerations in assessing ROV.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungLung NeoplasmsAnaplastic Lymphoma KinaseCrizotinibHumansProtein Kinase InhibitorsQuality-Adjusted Life YearsAnaplastic Lymphoma KinaseCrizotinibProtein Kinase Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID35527331
PMCPMC9130184
OpenAlexW4229371563

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.