Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35527302›Full record

Observational studyScandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine2022

The potential of new prediction models for emergency medical dispatch prioritisation of patients with chest pain: a cohort study.

Kristoffer Wibring, Markus Lingman, Johan Herlitz, Angela Bång

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kristoffer WibringDepartment of Ambulance and Prehospital Care, Region Halland, Varlabergsvägen 29, 434 39, Kungsbacka, Sweden. kristoffer.wibring@gu.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6910-230X
Markus LingmanDepartment of Molecular and Clinical Medicine/Cardiology, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Johan HerlitzThe Prehospital Research Center Western Sweden, University of Borås, Borås, Sweden.
Angela BångInstitute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.

Funding

Forskning och Utveckling, Halland HALLAND-209901
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo develop emergency medical dispatch (EMD) centre prediction models with high sensitivity and satisfying specificity to identify high-priority patients and patients suitable for non-emergency care respectively, when assessing patients with chest pain.

methodsObservational cohort study of 2917 unselected patients with chest pain who contacted an EMD centre in Sweden due to chest pain during 2018. Multivariate logistic regression was applied to develop models predicting low-risk or high-risk condition, that is, occurrence of time-sensitive diagnosis on hospital discharge.

resultsPrediction models were developed for the identification of patients suitable for high- and low-priority dispatch, using 11 and 10 variables respectively. The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUROC) for the high-risk prediction model was 0.79 and for the low-risk model it was 0.74. When applying the high-risk prediction model, 56% of the EMS missions were given highest priority, compared with 65% with the current standard. When applying the low-risk model, 7% were given the lowest priority compared to 1% for the current standard. The new prediction models outperformed today's dispatch priority accuracy in terms of sensitivity as well as positive and negative predictive value in both high- and low-risk prediction. The low-risk model predicted almost six times as many patients as having low-risk conditions compared with today's standard. This was done without increasing the number of high-risk patients wrongly assessed as low-risk.

conclusionsBy introducing prediction models, based on logistic regression analyses, using variables obtained by standard EMD-questions on age, sex, medical history and symptomology, EMD prioritisation can be improved compared with using current criteria index-based ones. This will allow a more efficient emergency medical services resource allocation.

Indexed as

Emergency Medical DispatchEmergency Medical ServicesChest PainCohort StudiesHumansTriageAcute coronary syndromeChest painEmergency medical dispatchEmergency medical servicesPrioritisationRisk assessmentSigns and symptoms

Identifiers

PMID35527302
PMCPMC9080130

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.