Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35527297›Full record

ArticleBMC gastroenterology2022

Application of a novel scoring system for gastric cancer opportunistic screening in hospital visits.

Qingjie Zhou, Yihan Chen, Jie Pan, Leying Zhou, Jiejun Lin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC gastroenterology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Diagnostic Risk Prediction Models for Upper Gastrointestinal Cancers: A Systematic Review.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Circulating Proteins as Diagnostic Markers in Gastric Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Qingjie ZhouDepartment of Gastroenterology, Wenzhou Central Hospital, Wenzhou, 325000, Zhejiang, China.
Yihan ChenDepartment of Gastroenterology, Wenzhou Central Hospital, Wenzhou, 325000, Zhejiang, China.
Jie PanDepartment of Gastroenterology, Wenzhou Central Hospital, Wenzhou, 325000, Zhejiang, China.
Leying ZhouDepartment of Gastroenterology, Wenzhou Central Hospital, Wenzhou, 325000, Zhejiang, China.
Jiejun LinDepartment of Gastroenterology, Wenzhou Central Hospital, Wenzhou, 325000, Zhejiang, China. Linjiejun177@163.com.
Wenzhou Central Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA novel scoring system and screening procedure for gastric cancer (GC) screening was proposed based on the national conditions of China, which state that endoscopy professionals and facilities are relatively limited compared with the large Chinese population.

methodsA novel scoring system for gastric cancer screening was used to retrospectively analyse the patients who met the screening procedure from April 2017 to December 2019 in our hospital. We divided all of the patients into three groups: low-risk group (0-11 scores), medium-risk group (12-16 scores), and high-risk group (17-23 scores). Statistical analysis was performed on the detection rate of gastric cancer and precursors of gastric cancer among these three groups.

resultsA total of 6701 patients were enrolled in this study, including 4,352(64.95%) in the low-risk group, 1,948 patients (29.07%) in the medium-risk group, and 401 patients (5.98%) in the high-risk group. The total detection rate of gastric cancer was 2.84% (190/6,701), with a 0.94% rate (41/4,352) in the low-risk group, a 5.18% rate (101/1,948) in the medium-risk group, and a 11.97% rate (48/401) in the high-risk group. There were statistically significant differences in the detection rate of gastric cancer among these three groups (all P < 0.05). The detection rate of early gastric cancer was 46.31% (88/190) among all of the detected gastric cancers in this study. In addition, the detection rates of differentiated gastric cancer and precursors of gastric cancer in the medium-risk group and high-risk group were significantly higher than those in the low-risk group. In addition, the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) of the novel scoring system in differentiating GC was 0.79.

conclusionThe screening strategy based on the novel scoring system can significantly improve the efficiency of gastric cancer opportunistic screening in hospital visits. Gastroscopy should be strongly recommended for patients in the medium-risk group and high-risk group, and detailed gastroscopy should be adopted as early as possible to improve the detection rate of early gastric cancer.

Indexed as

Stomach NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerGastroscopyHospitalsHumansMass ScreeningRetrospective StudiesEarly gastric cancerGastric cancerGastric cancer opportunistic screeningHospital visitNovel scoring system for gastric cancer screeningPrecursors of gastric cancer

Identifiers

PMID35527297
PMCPMC9080141
OpenAlexW4229332345

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.