Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35527264›Full record

ReviewMalaria journal2022

Receptivity to malaria: meaning and measurement.

Joshua O Yukich, Kim Lindblade, Jan Kolaczinski

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Malaria journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Territorial Persistence of ResidualTropical medicine and infectious disease · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Mapping residual malaria transmission in Vietnam.The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. An immune memory-structured SIS epidemiological model for hyperdiverse pathogens.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Joshua O YukichDepartment of Tropical Medicine, Center for Applied Malaria Research and Evaluation, Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, LA, USA. jyukich@tulane.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6160-5295
Kim LindbladeGlobal Malaria Programme, World Health Organization, Geneva, CH, USA.
Jan KolaczinskiGlobal Malaria Programme, World Health Organization, Geneva, CH, USA.

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

"Receptivity" to malaria is a construct developed during the Global Malaria Eradication Programme (GMEP) era. It has been defined in varied ways and no consistent, quantitative definition has emerged over the intervening decades. Despite the lack of consistency in defining this construct, the idea that some areas are more likely to sustain malaria transmission than others has remained important in decision-making in malaria control, planning for malaria elimination and guiding activities during the prevention of re-establishment (POR) period. This manuscript examines current advances in methods of measurement. In the context of a decades long decline in global malaria transmission and an increasing number of countries seeking to eliminate malaria, understanding and measuring malaria receptivity has acquired new relevance.

Indexed as

Disease EradicationMalariaHumansEliminationMalaria transmission measurementReceptivityTransmission networks

Identifiers

PMID35527264
PMCPMC9080212

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.