Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35527260›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2022

Dirofilaria immitis antigenemia and microfilaremia in Iberian wolves and red foxes from Portugal.

Sónia Gomes-de-Sá, Sérgio Santos-Silva, Alícia de Sousa Moreira, Patrícia Ferreira Barradas, Irina Amorim, Luís Cardoso, João R Mesquita

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. International journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2026
    Article
  3. Epidemiological Significance of the Fox (Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sónia Gomes-de-SáICBAS-School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Porto University, Porto, Portugal.
Sérgio Santos-SilvaICBAS-School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Porto University, Porto, Portugal.
Alícia de Sousa MoreiraICBAS-School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Porto University, Porto, Portugal.
Patrícia Ferreira BarradasICBAS-School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Porto University, Porto, Portugal.
Irina AmorimICBAS-School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Porto University, Porto, Portugal.
Luís CardosoDepartment of Veterinary Sciences and Animal and Veterinary Research Centre (CECAV), University of Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro (UTAD), Vila Real, Portugal. lcardoso@utad.pt.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6145-7560
João R MesquitaICBAS-School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Porto University, Porto, Portugal.
Universidade do Porto · PTUniversity of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro · PT

Funding

FCT LA/P/0059/2020FCT LA/P/0064/2020FCT UIDB/04750/2020FCT UIDB/CVT/00772/2020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDirofilaria immitis is a parasitic nematode endemic in the Mediterranean countries, which causes cardiopulmonary dirofilariosis in wild and domestic animals. Despite being recognized hosts of D. immitis, wild carnivores such as wolves and foxes are frequently disregarded when considering a potential role in the transmission of these zoonotic nematodes. In Portugal, studies available regarding D. immitis circulation are scarce, likely underestimating its relevance. To add knowledge on this, we sought to assess Iberian wolves (Canis lupus signatus) and red foxes (Vulpes vulpes) from northern Portugal for D. immitis antigenemia and microfilaremia.

methodsBlood samples from 42 Iberian wolves and 19 red foxes were collected, during 2010-2012, in Peneda-Gerês National Park. Antigenemia was searched for by rapid antigen detection test kits (Uranotest Dirofilaria ®). Microfilaremia was assessed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Nucleic acids were extracted from blood using QIAamp® DNA Mini Kit (Qiagen), and DNA was screened for the presence of microfilaria using a conventional PCR targeting the 5.8S-internal transcribed spacer 2-28S regions, followed by bidirectional sequencing, Basic Local Alignment Search Tool analysis and phylogenetic analysis.

resultsThree red foxes had antigenemia, with an occurrence of 15.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] 3.4-39.6), while showing no evidence for the presence of microfilaremia. No wolf samples presented evidence for D. immitis antigenemia. Nevertheless, two wolves were positive for D. immitis microfilaremia (4.8%; 95% CI 0.6-16.2%) as revealed by PCR and confirmed by bidirectional sequencing.

conclusionsAlthough Dirofilaria microfilaremia in wolves does not necessarily correlate to an endangerment of the infected animal's health, positive individuals can act as a reservoir for further infection if the intermediate mosquito hosts are present. To the best of our knowledge, one single study had reported that wolves were suitable Dirofilaria hosts, but microfilaremia have never been reported.

Indexed as

Dirofilaria immitisDirofilaria repensDirofilariasisWolvesAnimalsFoxesPhylogenyPortugalDirofilaria immitisFoxesPortugalWildlifeWolves

Identifiers

PMID35527260
PMCPMC9082910
OpenAlexW4229374428

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.