ArticleMicrobial cell factories2022
Exploring the impact of the recombinant Escherichia coli strain on defensins antimicrobial activity: BL21 versus Origami strain.
Article in Microbial cell factories, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Selective α-Amylase Inhibition by Plant Defensins: Structural Determinants, Engineering Strategies, and Translational Prospects.Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins · 2026Review
- Potential of inclusion bodies for disease control in aquaculture and livestock.Veterinary and animal science · 2026Review
- Recombinant production of antimicrobial proteins in bacterial expression systems: Escherichia coli vs. lactic acid bacteria.Microbial cell factories · 2025Review
- Scalable recombinant production of bioactive human neutrophil peptide-1 in Komagataella phaffii.AMB Express · 2025Article
- Exploring the therapeutic potential of recombinant bovine β-defensins for antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory functions in sepsis management.Veterinary research · 2025Article
- Evaluating Host Defense Peptides: A Comparative Analysis of Synthetic Peptides and Recombinant Concatemers.Biomolecules · 2025Article
- Recent advances in recombinant production of soluble proteins in E. coli.Microbial cell factories · 2025Review
- Unlocking the power of antimicrobial peptides: advances in production, optimization, and therapeutics.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025Review
- Immunomodulation Evidence of Nanostructured Recombinant Proteins in Salmonid Cells.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024Article
- Micro RNA profiles in colostrum exosomes obtained from primiparous or multiparous dairy cows.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2024Article
- A Novel Generation of Tailored Antimicrobial Drugs Based on Recombinant Multidomain Proteins.Pharmaceutics · 2023Article
- The future of recombinant host defense peptides.Microbial cell factories · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The growing emergence of microorganisms resistant to antibiotics has prompted the development of alternative antimicrobial therapies. Among them, the antimicrobial peptides produced by innate immunity, which are also known as host defense peptides (HDPs), hold great potential. They have been shown to exert activity against both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, including those resistant to antibiotics. These HDPs are classified into three categories: defensins, cathelicidins, and histatins. Traditionally, HDPs have been chemically synthesized, but this strategy often limits their application due to the high associated production costs. Alternatively, some HDPs have been recombinantly produced, but little is known about the impact of the bacterial strain in the recombinant product. This work aimed to assess the influence of the Escherichia coli strain used as cell factory to determine the activity and stability of recombinant defensins, which have 3 disulfide bonds. For that, an α-defensin [human α-defensin 5 (HD5)] and a β-defensin [bovine lingual antimicrobial peptide (LAP)] were produced in two recombinant backgrounds. The first one was an E. coli BL21 strain, which has a reducing cytoplasm, whereas the second was an E. coli Origami B, that is a strain with a more oxidizing cytoplasm. The results showed that both HD5 and LAP, fused to Green Fluorescent Protein (GFP), were successfully produced in both BL21 and Origami B strains. However, differences were observed in the HDP production yield and bactericidal activity, especially for the HD5-based protein. The HD5 protein fused to GFP was not only produced at higher yields in the E. coli BL21 strain, but it also showed a higher quality and stability than that produced in the Origami B strain. Hence, this data showed that the strain had a clear impact on both HDPs quantity and quality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.