ArticleExperimental animals2022
A controlled ovarian stimulation procedure suitable for cynomolgus macaques.
Article in Experimental animals, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to develop a more suitable ovarian stimulation procedure for cynomolgus macaques (Macaca fascicularis). Macaques were divided into 4 groups, 7AG, 8AG, 7AN, and 8AN, according to the ovarian stimulation procedure administered (i.e., administration of either a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist [GnRH-a] or GnRH antagonist [GnRH-ant]) and the number of menstruations (≤ 7 times or ≥ 8 times) in the previous year. In both procedures, oocyte growth and maturation were induced by administration of human follicle-stimulating hormone and human chorionic gonadotropin. The mean numbers of metaphase II mature and metaphase I premature oocytes collected from the 7AG, 8AG, 7AN, and 8AN groups were 12.1 and 10.4, 12.0 and 13.8, 9.1 and 8.3, and 15.5 and 8.8, respectively (P>0.05). The fertilization rates of the 7AN and 8AN groups (85.3% and 74.7%) tended to be higher compared with those in the 7AG and 8AG groups (59.1% and 47.3%; P>0.05). The 8AN group yielded 19.9 zygotes, which was the largest number per macaque, compared with the other three groups. Furthermore, regarding the decreases in body weight between the start of the procedures and the time of oocyte collection, those of the 7AN and 8AN groups were significantly smaller than those of the 7AG and 8AG groups (P<0.05), suggesting that the procedure involving GnRH-ant reduced the burden on the macaques. Thus, controlled ovarian stimulation using a GnRH-ant has some advantages for cynomolgus macaques compared with that using a GnRH-a.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.