Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35526973›Full record

ReviewPhysical medicine and rehabilitation clinics of North America2022

Trigger Point Injections.

Malathy Appasamy, Christopher Lam, John Alm, Andrea L Chadwick

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Physical medicine and rehabilitation clinics of North America, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Malathy AppasamyDepartment of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Main Line Health System, 600 Evergreen Drive, 2nd Floor, Glen Mills, PA 19342, USA.
Christopher LamDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Kansas School of Medicine, 3901 Rainbow Boulevard, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA.
John AlmDepartment of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Kansas School of Medicine, 3901 Rainbow Boulevard, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA.
Andrea L ChadwickDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Kansas School of Medicine, 3901 Rainbow Boulevard, MailStop 1034, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA. Electronic address: anicol@kumc.edu.
University of Kansas · USThomas Jefferson University · US

Funding

Central Nervous System Amplification in Lumbar Failed Back Surgery SyndromeK23GM123320 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER · PI CHADWICK, ANDREA LYNN · 2017 to 2022
$1.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS K23 GM123320
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Myofascial pain and myofascial pain syndromes are among some of the most common acute and chronic pain conditions. Many interventional procedures can be performed in both an acute and chronic pain setting to address myofascial pain syndromes. Trigger point injections can be performed with or without imaging guidance such as fluoroscopy and ultrasound; however, the use of imaging in years past has been recommended to improve patient outcome and safety. Injections can be performed using no injectate (dry needling), or can involve the administration of local anesthetics, botulinum toxin, or corticosteroids.

Indexed as

Chronic PainMyofascial Pain SyndromesAnesthetics, LocalHumansTreatment OutcomeTrigger PointsAnesthetics, LocalBotulinum toxinCorticosteroidLocal anestheticMyofascial painPiriformis syndromeTrigger point injection

Identifiers

PMID35526973
PMCPMC9116734
OpenAlexW4229018995

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.