Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35526199›Full record

ArticleAnnals of intensive care2022

Monitoring of circulating monocyte HLA-DR expression in a large cohort of intensive care patients: relation with secondary infections.

C de Roquetaillade, C Dupuis, V Faivre, A C Lukaszewicz, C Brumpt, D Payen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of intensive care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
7.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Observational
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

C de Roquetaillade *Anesthesiology and Critical Care Unit, Hopital Lariboisière, Paris, France. charles.de-roquetaillade@aphp.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3333-4686
C DupuisMedical Intensive Care Unit, Clermont-Ferrand University Hospital, 58 rue Montalembert, 63003, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
V FaivreAnesthesiology Laboratory, Hospital Lariboisière, Paris, France.
A C LukaszewiczAnesthesia & Critical Care, Hospital Neurologique, Hospices Civils de Lyon, EA 7426: Pathophysiology of Injury-Induced Immunosuppression (PI3), Université de Lyon 1, Lyon, France.
C BrumptService d'Hématologie Biologique, Pôle B2P, Hôpital Lariboisière, APHP, Paris, France.
D Payen *Université Paris 7 UFR de Médecine, 110 A venue de Verdun, 75010, Paris, France.
Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Clermont-Ferrand · FRHôpital Lariboisière · FRInserm · FRUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FRUniversité Paris Cité · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe reports of an early and profound acquired immunodepression syndrome (AIDs) in ICU patients had gained sufficient credence to modify the paradigm of acute inflammation. However, despite several articles published on AIDs and its assessment by monocytic HLA-DR monitoring, several missing informations remained: 1-Which patients' are more prone to benefit from mHLA-DR measurement, 2-Is the nadir or the duration of the low mHLA-DR expression the main parameter to consider? 3-What are the compared performances of leukocytes' count analyses (lymphocyte, monocyte). MATERIAL AND

methodWe conducted an observational study in a surgical ICU of a French tertiary hospital. A first mHLA-DR measurement (fixed flow cytometry protocol) was performed within the first 3 days following admission and a 2nd, between day 5 and 10. The other collected parameters were: SAPS II and SOFA scores, sex, age, comorbidities, mortality and ICU-acquired infections (IAI). The associations between mHLA-DR and outcomes were tested by adjusted Fine and Gray subdistribution competing risk models.

results1053 patients were included in the study, of whom 592 had a 2nd mHLA-DR measurement. In this cohort, 223 patients (37.7%) complicated by IAI. The initial decrement in mHLA-DR was not associated with the later occurrence of IAI, (p = 0.721), however, the persistence of a low mHLA-DR (< 8000 AB/C), measured between day 5 and day 7, was associated with the later occurrence of IAI (p = 0.01). Similarly, a negative slope between the first and the second value was significantly associated with subsequent IAI (p = 0.009). The best performance of selected markers was obtained with the combination of the second mHLA-DR measurement with SAPSII on admission. Persisting lymphopenia and monocytopenia were not associated with later occurrence of IAI.

conclusionDownregulation of mHLA-DR following admission is observed in a vast number of patients whatever the initial motif for admission. IAI mostly occurs among patients with a high severity score on admission suggesting that immune monitoring should be reserved to the most severe patients. The initial downregulation did not preclude the later development of IAI. A decreasing or a persisting low mHLA-DR expression below 8000AB/C within the first 7 days of ICU admission was independently and reliably associated with subsequent IAI among ICU patients with performances superior to leukocyte subsets count alone.

Indexed as

HLA-DRICU immunodepressionImmune monitoringInnate immunityIntensive care patientsSeptic shock

Identifiers

PMID35526199
PMCPMC9079217
OpenAlexW4229332180

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.