Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35526144›Full record

ArticleTransboundary and emerging diseases2022

Evaluation of the economic impact of classical and African swine fever epidemics using OutCosT, a new spreadsheet-based tool.

Jordi Casal, Damián Tago, Pilar Pineda, Blagojcho Tabakovski, Imelda Santos, Carolyn Benigno, Tran Huynh, Giovanna Ciaravino, Daniel Beltran-Alcrudo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Transboundary and emerging diseases, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Pig Health Assessment Framework Based on Behavioural Analysis.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. African Swine Fever: A One Health Perspective and Global Challenges.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jordi CasalDepartment Sanitat i Anatomia Animals, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6909-9366
Damián TagoFood and Agriculture Organization (FAO), Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific, Bangkok, Thailand.
Pilar PinedaDepartment Sanitat i Anatomia Animals, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9752-3438
Blagojcho TabakovskiFood and Veterinary Agency of the Republic of North Macedonia, Skopje, North Macedonia.
Imelda SantosBureau of Animal Industry, Department of Agriculture, Quezon City, Philippines.
Carolyn BenignoPhilippine College of Veterinary Epidemiologists, Quezon City, Philippines.
Tran HuynhFood and Agriculture Organization (FAO), Rome, Italy.
Giovanna CiaravinoDepartment Sanitat i Anatomia Animals, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5796-8093
Daniel Beltran-AlcrudoFood and Agriculture Organization (FAO), Regional Office for Europe and Central Asia, Budapest, Hungary.

Funding

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations TCP/RER/3704United States Agency for International Development (USAID) 720FDA19IO00092
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

African swine fever (ASF) and classical swine fever (CSF) are two major transboundary animal diseases of swine with important socioeconomic consequences at farm, subnational and national level. The objective of this study was to evaluate the direct cost of outbreaks and their control at country/regional level in four countries: namely CSF in Colombia in 2015-2016, the retrospective cost of ASF in the Philippines in 2019 and in a province of Vietnam in 2020 and a hypothetical ASF scenario in one region in North Macedonia, using the newly developed Outbreak Costing Tool (OutCosT). The tool calculates the costs of 106 different items, broken down by up to four types of farms, and by who assumes the cost (whether veterinary services, farmers or other stakeholders). The total cost of CSF in Colombia was US$ 3.8 million, of which 88% represented the cost of the vaccination campaign. For ASF, there were wide differences between countries: US$ 8,26,911 in Lao Cai (Vietnam), US$ 33,19,666 in North Macedonia and over US$ 58 million in the Philippines. While in the Philippines and Vietnam, 96-98% of the cost occurred in the affected farms, the highest expenditure in North Macedonia scenario was the movement control of the neighbouring and at-risk farms (77%). These important differences between countries depend on the spread of the disease, but also on the production systems affected and the measures applied. Apart from the financial cost, these diseases have other negative impacts, especially in the livelihoods of smallholder farms. The OutCosT tool also allows users to evaluate qualitatively other important aspects related to the epidemics, such as the impact on human health, the environment, animal welfare, socioeconomic vulnerability, trading and political response. OutCosT, which is a FAO corporate tool (available online at: https://www.fao.org/fileadmin/user_upload/faoweb/animal-health/OutCosT_PIG.xlsx), can be an important tool to support country authorities to rapidly respond to a swine disease outbreak by estimating the associated costs and for advocacy purposes to mobilize resources at national or international levels.

Indexed as

African Swine FeverAfrican Swine Fever VirusClassical Swine FeverEpidemicsAnimalsDisease OutbreaksHumansRetrospective StudiesSwineAfrican swine feverclassical swine feverColombiaeconomic costNorth Macedoniathe PhilippinestoolVietnam

Identifiers

PMID35526144
PMCPMC9790658

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.