Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35526066›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial resistance and infection control2022

Point prevalence study of antibiotic appropriateness and possibility of early discharge from hospital among patients treated with antibiotics in a Swiss University Hospital.

Estelle Moulin, Noémie Boillat-Blanco, Giorgio Zanetti, Catherine Plüss-Suard, Serge de Vallière, Laurence Senn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial resistance and infection control, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Estelle MoulinPrevention and Infection Control Unit, Department of Medicine, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne, Chemin de Mont-Paisible 18, 1011, Lausanne, Switzerland. Estelle.Moulin@chuv.ch.
Noémie Boillat-BlancoService of Infectious Diseases, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Giorgio ZanettiPrevention and Infection Control Unit, Department of Medicine, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne, Chemin de Mont-Paisible 18, 1011, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Catherine Plüss-SuardSwiss Centre for Antibiotic Resistance (ANRESIS), Institute for Infectious Diseases, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Serge de VallièreService of Infectious Diseases, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Laurence SennPrevention and Infection Control Unit, Department of Medicine, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne, Chemin de Mont-Paisible 18, 1011, Lausanne, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe growing threat of multidrug resistant organisms have led to increasingly promote prudent and rational use of antimicrobials as well as early hospital discharge plan. Antibiotic stewardship programs (ASP) have been developed as multifaceted approaches to improve use of current antibiotics and are now widely applied through different strategies. Proactive interventions are still limited in Switzerland and data on antimicrobial appropriateness and early discharge strategies are lacking. We aimed to describe the opportunities of antibiotics prescriptions optimization at Lausanne University Hospital, Switzerland and evaluate the suitability for early discharge among patients receiving antibiotics. The need for outpatient medical structures was also assessed.

methodsWe conducted a point prevalence survey of antibiotic prescriptions in adult medical and surgical units with exclusion of intermediate and intensive care units. All hospitalized patients receiving a systemic antibiotic on the day of evaluation were included. An infectious diseases specialist evaluated antimicrobial appropriateness and assessed suitability for discharge according to medical and nursing observations. The need of flexible additional outpatient facility for a close medical follow-up was evaluated concomitantly.

resultsA total of 564 patients' files were reviewed. 182 (32%) patients received one or more systemic antibiotic: 62 (34%) as a prophylaxis and 120 (66%) as a treatment with or without concomitant prophylaxis. 37/62 (60%) patients receiving prophylaxis had no indication to continue the antibacterial. Regarding the patients treated with antibiotics, 69/120 (58%) presented at least one opportunity for treatment optimization, mainly interruption of treatment. A previous ID consultation was recorded for 55/120 (46%) patients, of whom 21 (38%) could have benefited from antimicrobial therapy optimization on the day of the point assessment. 9.2% patients were eligible for discharge of whom 64% could leave the hospital with a close outpatient follow-up for infectious issues.

conclusionsThis point prevalence study offers precious indicators for tailoring future antibiotic stewardship interventions that can be combined with early discharge. Any centre considering implementing ASP should conduct this type of analysis with a pragmatic approach to gain insight into local practices and needed resources.

Indexed as

Anti-Infective AgentsCommunicable DiseasesAdultAnti-Bacterial AgentsHospitals, UniversityHumansPatient DischargePrevalenceSwitzerlandAnti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Infective AgentsAntibiotic stewardship programsEarly dischargeOutpatient parenteral therapy

Identifiers

PMID35526066
PMCPMC9080203

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.