Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35526012›Full record

ArticleConflict and health2022

Implementation of maternal and perinatal death surveillance and response (MPDSR) in humanitarian settings: insights and experiences of humanitarian health practitioners and global technical expert meeting attendees.

Neal Russell, Hannah Tappis, Jean Paul Mwanga, Benjamin Black, Kusum Thapa, Endang Handzel, Elaine Scudder, Ribka Amsalu, Jyoti Reddi, Francesca Palestra and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Conflict and health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review of maternal death audits in refugee camps in UNHCR East and Horn of Africa and Great Lakes Region, 2017-2019.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Neal Russell, London, UK. nrussell@sgul.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9538-7695
Hannah TappisJhpiego, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Jean Paul MwangaHôpital Générale de Mweso, Nord Kivu, Democratic Republic of the Congo.
Benjamin BlackMédecins Sans Frontières, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Kusum ThapaJhpiego, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Endang HandzelCentre for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Elaine ScudderInternational Rescue Committee, New York, NY, USA.
Ribka AmsaluUniversity of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Jyoti ReddiWorld Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Francesca PalestraWorld Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Allisyn C MoranWorld Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.

Funding

Transdisciplinary Research Training to Reduce Disparities in Preterm Birth and Improve Maternal and Neonatal OutcomesT32HD098057 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI KUPPERMANN, MIRIAM · 2019 to 2023
$1.4M
NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD098057World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMaternal and perinatal death surveillance and response (MPDSR) is a system of identifying, analysing and learning lessons from such deaths in order to respond and prevent future deaths, and has been recommended by WHO and implemented in many low-and-middle income settings in recent years. However, there is limited documentation of experience with MPDSR in humanitarian settings. A meeting on MPDSR in humanitarian settings was convened by WHO, UNICEF, CDC and Save the Children, UNFPA and UNHCR on 17th-18th October 2019, informed by semi-structured interviews with a range of professionals, including expert attendees. CONSULTATION

findingsInterviewees revealed significant obstacles to full implementation of the MPDSR process in humanitarian settings. Many obstacles were familiar to low resource settings in general but were amplified in the context of a humanitarian crisis, such as overburdened services, disincentives to reporting, accountability gaps, a blame approach, and politicisation of mortality. Factors more unique to humanitarian contexts included concerns about health worker security and moral distress. There are varying levels of institutionalisation and implementation capacity for MPDSR within humanitarian organisations. It is suggested that if poorly implemented, particularly with a punitive or blame approach, MPDSR may be counterproductive. Nevertheless, successes in MPDSR were described whereby the process led to concrete actions to prevent deaths, and where death reviews have led to improved understanding of complex and rectifiable contextual factors leading to deaths in humanitarian settings.

conclusionsDespite the challenges, examples exist where the lessons learnt from MPDSR processes have led to improved access and quality of care in humanitarian contexts, including successful advocacy. An adapted approach is required to ensure feasibility, with varying implementation being possible in different phases of crises. There is a need for guidance on MPDSR in humanitarian contexts, and for greater documentation and learning from experiences.

Indexed as

HumanitarianMaternalMortalityPerinatalResponseReviewSurveillance

Identifiers

PMID35526012
PMCPMC9077967

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.