Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35526009›Full record

ArticleCritical care (London, England)2022

Lung response to prone positioning in mechanically-ventilated patients with COVID-19.

Alessandro Protti, Alessandro Santini, Francesca Pennati, Chiara Chiurazzi, Michele Ferrari, Giacomo E Iapichino, Luca Carenzo, Francesca Dalla Corte, Ezio Lanza, Nicolò Martinetti and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care (London, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Right ventricular-protective ventilation in acute respiratory distress syndrome: phenotypes, monitoring and ventilatory management.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Enhanced glomerular thrombosis in pronated animals with ARDS.Intensive care medicine experimental · 2025
    Article
  8. Observational
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Extended prone positioning for intubated ARDS: a review.Critical care (London, England) · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Alessandro ProttiDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy. alessandro.protti@hunimed.eu.
Alessandro SantiniDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Units, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.
Francesca PennatiDipartimento di Elettronica, Informazione e Bioingegneria, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Chiara ChiurazziDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Units, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.
Michele FerrariDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Units, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.
Giacomo E IapichinoDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Units, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.
Luca CarenzoDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Units, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.
Francesca Dalla CorteDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Units, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.
Ezio LanzaDepartment of Radiology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.
Nicolò MartinettiDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy.
Andrea AlivertiDipartimento di Elettronica, Informazione e Bioingegneria, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Maurizio CecconiDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy.
IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital · ITHumanitas University · ITPolitecnico di Milano · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProne positioning improves survival in moderate-to-severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) unrelated to the novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19). This benefit is probably mediated by a decrease in alveolar collapse and hyperinflation and a more homogeneous distribution of lung aeration, with fewer harms from mechanical ventilation. In this preliminary physiological study we aimed to verify whether prone positioning causes analogue changes in lung aeration in COVID-19. A positive result would support prone positioning even in this other population.

methodsFifteen mechanically-ventilated patients with COVID-19 underwent a lung computed tomography in the supine and prone position with a constant positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) within three days of endotracheal intubation. Using quantitative analysis, we measured the volume of the non-aerated, poorly-aerated, well-aerated, and over-aerated compartments and the gas-to-tissue ratio of the ten vertical levels of the lung. In addition, we expressed the heterogeneity of lung aeration with the standardized median absolute deviation of the ten vertical gas-to-tissue ratios, with lower values indicating less heterogeneity.

resultsBy the time of the study, PEEP was 12 (10-14) cmH

conclusionsIn fifteen patients with COVID-19, prone positioning decreased alveolar collapse, hyperinflation, and homogenized lung aeration. A similar response has been observed in other ARDS, where prone positioning improves outcome. Therefore, our data provide a pathophysiological rationale to support prone positioning even in COVID-19.

Indexed as

COVID-19Respiratory Distress SyndromeHumansLungProne PositionRespiration, ArtificialAcute respiratory distress syndromeCoronavirus disease 2019HypoxiaMechanical ventilationPneumoniaProne positioning

Identifiers

PMID35526009
PMCPMC9076814
OpenAlexW4229078312

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.