Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35526001›Full record

ArticleOrphanet journal of rare diseases2022

Recommendations from the IRDiRC Working Group on methodologies to assess the impact of diagnoses and therapies on rare disease patients.

Galliano Zanello, Chun-Hung Chan, David A Pearce, IRDiRC Working Group

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Orphanet journal of rare diseases, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Drug Repurposing in Crohn's Disease Using Danish Real-World Data.Pragmatic and observational research · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. The future of rare autonomic disease research.Clinical autonomic research : official journal of the Clinical Autonomic Research Society · 2023
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Galliano ZanelloIRDiRC Scientific Secretariat, INSERM, Paris, France.
Chun-Hung ChanSanford Research, Sioux Falls, SD, 57104, USA.
David A PearceSanford Research, Sioux Falls, SD, 57104, USA. david.pearce@sanfordhealth.org.ORCID 0000-0002-0707-063X
IRDiRC Working Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rare disease patients face many challenges including diagnostic delay, misdiagnosis and lack of therapies. However, early access to diagnosis and therapies can modify the management and the progression of diseases, which in return positively impacts patients, families and health care systems. The International Rare Diseases Research Consortium set up the multi-stakeholder Working Group on developing methodologies to assess the impact of diagnoses and therapies on rare disease patients. Using the patients' journey on the diagnostic paradigm, the Working Group characterized a set of metrics, tools and needs required for appropriate data collection and establishment of a framework of methodologies to analyze the socio-economic burden of rare diseases on patients, families and health care systems. These recommendations are intended to facilitate the development of methodologies and to better assess the societal impact of rare diseases.

Indexed as

Delayed DiagnosisRare DiseasesHumansCare giversDiagnosisFamiliesHealth care systemsPatientsPayersRare diseasesSocio-economic impactTherapies

Identifiers

PMID35526001
PMCPMC9078009

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.