Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35525981›Full record

ArticleHealth research policy and systems2022

Enhancing the capacity of the mental health and substance use health workforce to meet population needs: insights from a facilitated virtual policy dialogue.

Kathleen Leslie, Mary Bartram, Jelena Atanackovic, Caroline Chamberland-Rowe, Christine Tulk, Ivy Lynn Bourgeault

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health research policy and systems, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kathleen LeslieFaculty of Health Disciplines, Athabasca University, 1 University Drive Athabasca, Athabasca, AB, T9S 3A3, Canada. kleslie@athabascau.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0581-126X
Mary BartramMental Health Commission of Canada, 350 Albert Street, Suite 1210, Ottawa, ON, K1R 1A4, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2548-5852
Jelena AtanackovicSchool of Sociological and Anthropological Studies, University of Ottawa, 75 Laurier Avenue East, Ottawa, ON, K1N 6N5, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6324-1958
Caroline Chamberland-RoweTelfer School of Management, University of Ottawa, 75 Laurier Avenue East, Ottawa, ON, K1N 6N5, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3097-2666
Christine TulkFaculty of Arts and Social Sciences, Carleton University, 1125 Colonel By Drive, Ottawa, ON, K1S 5B6, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7312-7406
Ivy Lynn BourgeaultSchool of Sociological and Anthropological Studies, University of Ottawa, 75 Laurier Avenue East, Ottawa, ON, K1N 6N5, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5113-9243

Funding

CIHR 173110
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTimely knowledge mobilization has become increasingly critical during the COVID-19 pandemic and complicated by the need to establish or maintain lines of communication between researchers and decision-makers virtually. Our recent pan-Canadian research study on the mental health and substance use health (MHSUH) workforce during the pandemic identified key policy barriers impacting this essential workforce. To bridge the evidence-policy gap in addressing these barriers, we held a facilitated virtual policy dialogue. This paper discusses the insights generated at this virtual policy dialogue and highlights how this integrated knowledge mobilization strategy can help drive evidence-based policy in an increasingly digital world.

methodsWe held a 3-hour virtual policy dialogue with 46 stakeholders and policy decision-makers as the final phase in our year-long mixed-methods research study. The event was part of our integrated knowledge mobilization strategy and was designed to generate stakeholder-driven policy implications and priority actions based on our research findings. The data collected from the virtual policy dialogue included transcripts from the small-group breakout rooms and main sessions, reflective field notes and the final report from the external facilitator. Coded data were thematically analysed to inform our understanding of the prioritization of the policy implications and action items.

resultsFacilitated virtual policy dialogues generate rich qualitative insights that guide community-informed knowledge mobilization strategies and promote evidence-informed policy. Our policy dialogue identified actionable policy recommendations with equity as a cross-cutting theme. Adapting policy dialogues to virtual formats and including technology-assisted facilitation can offer advantages for equitable stakeholder participation, allow for deeper analysis and help build consensus regarding evidence-based policy priorities.

conclusionsOur facilitated virtual policy dialogue was a key knowledge mobilization strategy for our research on the capacity of the Canadian MHSUH workforce to respond to the COVID-19 pandemic. Our policy dialogue allowed us to engage a diverse group of MHSUH workforce stakeholders in a meaningful action-oriented way, provided an avenue to get feedback on our research findings, and generated prioritized action items that incorporated the knowledge and experience of these MHSUH workforce stakeholders.

Indexed as

COVID-19Substance-Related DisordersCanadaHealth PolicyHealth WorkforceHumansMental HealthPandemicsCOVID-19Evidence-informed policyKnowledge mobilizationStakeholder participation in researchVirtual policy dialogue

Identifiers

PMID35525981
PMCPMC9077339

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.