Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35525944›Full record

ArticleBMC microbiology2022

Phenotype and genetic determination of resistance to common disinfectants among biofilm-producing and non-producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains from clinical specimens in Iran.

Mehdi Bakht, Safar Ali Alizadeh, Sara Rahimi, Raana Kazemzadeh Anari, Mohammad Rostamani, Amir Javadi, Amir Peymani, Seyed Mahmoud Amin Marashi, Farhad Nikkhahi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Modern antiseptics against multidrug-resistantFrontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. A review of colistin-resistantArchives of Razi Institute · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Carbapenem-ResistantMicroorganisms · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mehdi BakhtMedical Microbiology Research Center, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran.
Safar Ali AlizadehMedical Microbiology Research Center, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran.
Sara RahimiMedical Microbiology Research Center, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran.
Raana Kazemzadeh AnariMedical Microbiology Research Center, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran.
Mohammad RostamaniMedical Microbiology Research Center, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran.
Amir JavadiMedical Microbiology Research Center, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran.
Amir PeymaniMedical Microbiology Research Center, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran.
Seyed Mahmoud Amin MarashiMedical Microbiology Research Center, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran.
Farhad NikkhahiMedical Microbiology Research Center, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran. Farhadnikkhahi@gmail.com.
Qazvin University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPseudomonas aeruginosa is a common pathogen in Hospitalized patients, and its various resistance mechanisms contribute to patient morbidity and mortality. The main aims of the present study were to assess the susceptibility of biofilm-producing and non-producing P. aeruginosa isolates to the five commonly used Hospital disinfectants, to evaluate the synergistic effect of selected disinfectants and Ethylene-diamine-tetra acetic acid (EDTA), and the effect of exposure to sub-inhibitory concentrations of Sodium hypochlorite on antimicrobial susceptibility test.

resultsThe results showed that sodium hypochlorite 5% and Ethanol 70% were the most and least effective disinfectants against P. aeruginosa, respectively. The addition of EDTA significantly increased the effectiveness of the selected disinfectants. The changes in the antibiotic-resistance profiles after exposure to sub-inhibitory concentrations of disinfectants were observed for different classes of antibiotics (Carbapenems, Aminoglycosides, Cephalosporins, Fluoroquinolones). As well as near the all isolates harbored efflux pump genes and 117 (97.5%) of isolates produced biofilm.

conclusionIn the current study, the mixture of disinfectant and EDTA were the most suitable selection to disinfect Hospital surfaces and instruments. Also, it was clear that exposure to sub-inhibitory concentrations of Sodium hypochlorite results in resistance to some antibiotics in P. aeruginosa species. Strong and intermediate biofilm formers belonged to MDR/XDR strains. Future studies should include more complex microbial communities residing in the Hospitals, and more disinfectants use in Hospitals.

Indexed as

DisinfectantsPseudomonas aeruginosaAnti-Bacterial AgentsBiofilmsEdetic AcidHumansIranMicrobial Sensitivity TestsPhenotypeSodium HypochloriteAnti-Bacterial AgentsDisinfectantsEdetic AcidSodium HypochloriteBiofilmClinical isolatesDisinfectant-resistanceHospital disinfectantsNosocomial infectionPseudomonas aeruginosa

Identifiers

PMID35525944
PMCPMC9078005
OpenAlexW4229065534

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.