ArticleRheumatology international2022
Pericardial effusion in giant cell arteritis is associated with increased inflammatory markers: a retrospective cohort study.
Article in Rheumatology international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Hemorrhagic Pericarditis as a Harbinger of Giant Cell Arteritis Relapse.JACC. Case reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveGiant cell arteritis (GCA) is the most frequent vasculitis affecting adults aged > 50 years. Cardiac involvement in GCA is considered rare, and only a few cases of pericarditis have been reported. The aim of this study was to determine the characteristics and prognosis of GCA patients suffering from pericardial involvement at diagnosis.
methodsWe conducted a single-centre, retrospective chart review of patients with GCA in internal medicine departments (from 2000 to 2020). Patients were identified through a centralized hospital database. We retrospectively collected demographic, clinicobiological, histological, imaging, treatment and outcome data. Patients with pericardial effusion, defined as an effusion visible on the CT-scan performed at GCA diagnosis were compared to those without pericardial involvement.
resultsAmong the 250 patients with GCA, 23 patients (9.2%) had pericardial effusion on CT-scan. The comparison between the groups revealed similar distribution of age, gender, cranial symptoms and ocular ischaemic complications. Patients with pericardial effusion had a higher frequency of weight loss. They also had lower haemoglobin levels and higher platelet levels (p = 0.006 and p = 0.002, respectively), and they more frequently had positive temporal artery biopsy. There were no differences concerning the treatment, relapses, follow-up duration or deaths.
conclusionsThis case series sheds light on GCA as a cause of unexplained pericardial effusion or symptomatic pericarditis among adults aged > 50 years and elevated inflammatory biological markers. Fortunately, pericardial involvement is a benign GCA manifestation. In that context, the search for constitutional symptoms, cranial symptoms and associated signs of polymyalgia rheumatica is crucial for rapidly guiding GCA diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.