Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35525854›Full record

ArticleMicrobial ecology2023

Domestication of Lima Bean (Phaseolus lunatus) Changes the Microbial Communities in the Rhizosphere.

Josieli Lima da Silva, Lucas William Mendes, Sandra Mara Barbosa Rocha, Jadson Emanuel Lopes Antunes, Louise Melo de Souza Oliveira, Vania Maria Maciel Melo, Francisca Andrea Silva Oliveira, Arthur Prudêncio de Araujo Pereira, Gérson do Nascimento Costa, Veronica Brito da Silva and 4 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Microbial ecology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Josieli Lima da SilvaPlant Genetic Resource Group, Agricultural Science Center, Federal University of Piauí, Teresina, PI, Brazil.
Lucas William MendesCenter for Nuclear Energy in Agriculture, University of Sao Paulo, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil.
Sandra Mara Barbosa RochaSoil Microbial Ecology Group, Agricultural Science Center, Federal University of Piauí, Teresina, PI, Brazil.
Jadson Emanuel Lopes AntunesSoil Microbial Ecology Group, Agricultural Science Center, Federal University of Piauí, Teresina, PI, Brazil.
Louise Melo de Souza OliveiraSoil Microbial Ecology Group, Agricultural Science Center, Federal University of Piauí, Teresina, PI, Brazil.
Vania Maria Maciel MeloLaboratório de Ecologia Microbiana E Biotecnologia, Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil.
Francisca Andrea Silva OliveiraLaboratório de Ecologia Microbiana E Biotecnologia, Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil.
Arthur Prudêncio de Araujo PereiraSoil Science Department, Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil.
Gérson do Nascimento CostaPlant Genetic Resource Group, Agricultural Science Center, Federal University of Piauí, Teresina, PI, Brazil.
Veronica Brito da SilvaPlant Genetic Resource Group, Agricultural Science Center, Federal University of Piauí, Teresina, PI, Brazil.
Regina Lucia Ferreira GomesPlant Genetic Resource Group, Agricultural Science Center, Federal University of Piauí, Teresina, PI, Brazil.
Francisco de Alcantara NetoPlant Science Department, Agricultural Science Center, Federal University of Piauí, Teresina, PI, Brazil.
Angela Celis de Almeida LopesPlant Genetic Resource Group, Agricultural Science Center, Federal University of Piauí, Teresina, PI, Brazil.
Ademir Sérgio Ferreira AraujoSoil Microbial Ecology Group, Agricultural Science Center, Federal University of Piauí, Teresina, PI, Brazil. asfaruaj@yahoo.com.br.
Universidade Federal do Piauí · BRUniversidade Federal do Ceará · BRUniversidade de São Paulo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plants modulate the soil microbiota and select a specific microbial community in the rhizosphere. However, plant domestication reduces genetic diversity, changes plant physiology, and could have an impact on the associated microbiome assembly. Here, we used 16S rRNA gene sequencing to assess the microbial community in the bulk soil and rhizosphere of wild, semi-domesticated, and domesticated genotypes of lima bean (Phaseolus lunatus), to investigate the effect of plant domestication on microbial community assembly. In general, rhizosphere communities were more diverse than bulk soil, but no differences were found among genotypes. Our results showed that the microbial community's structure was different from wild and semi-domesticated as compared to domesticated genotypes. The community similarity decreased 57.67% from wild to domesticated genotypes. In general, the most abundant phyla were Actinobacteria (21.9%), Proteobacteria (20.7%), Acidobacteria (14%), and Firmicutes (9.7%). Comparing the different genotypes, the analysis showed that Firmicutes (Bacillus) was abundant in the rhizosphere of the wild genotypes, while Acidobacteria dominated semi-domesticated plants, and Proteobacteria (including rhizobia) was enriched in domesticated P. lunatus rhizosphere. The domestication process also affected the microbial community network, in which the complexity of connections decreased from wild to domesticated genotypes in the rhizosphere. Together, our work showed that the domestication of P. lunatus shaped rhizosphere microbial communities from taxonomic to a functional level, changing the abundance of specific microbial groups and decreasing the complexity of interactions among them.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaPhaseolusAcidobacteriaDomesticationPlant RootsPlantsProteobacteriaRhizosphereRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSoilSoil MicrobiologyRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSoil16S rRNA geneDomestication syndromeMicrobial ecologyPlant–microbe interaction

Identifiers

PMID35525854
OpenAlexW4229335830

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.