Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35525708›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage. Clinical2022

Excess significance and power miscalculations in neurofeedback research.

Robert T Thibault, Hugo Pedder

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage. Clinical, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. From lab to life: challenges and perspectives of fNIRS for haemodynamic-based neurofeedback in real-world environments.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Robert T ThibaultMeta-Research Innovation Center at Stanford (METRICS), Stanford University, United States; School of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, United Kingdom. Electronic address: robert.thibault@stanford.edu.
Hugo PedderDepartment Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, United Kingdom.
Protein Metrics (United States) · USUniversity of Bristol · GB

Funding

Department of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

NeurofeedbackBrain MappingHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeuroimagingfMRIfNIRSNeurofeedbackNeuroimagingStatistical power analysis

Identifiers

PMID35525708
PMCPMC9421468
OpenAlexW4225012768

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.