ArticleActa biomaterialia2022
Comprehensive experimental assessments of rheological models' performance in elastography of soft tissues.
Article in Acta biomaterialia, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.
- Mechanical rheological model on the assessment of elasticity and viscosity in tissue inflammation: A systematic review.PloS one · 2024Pooled it
- Frequency and Direction-Dependent Shear-Wave Responses in Ex Vivo Tissues Measured by a Time-of-Flight Device.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Ultrasonic viscoelastic imaging: a tool for parotid gland tumor differentiation.European radiology · 2026Article
- Usage of the adaptive quasi-linear viscoelastic model to predict load-unload, stress-relaxation, and sine load of porcine liver.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Article
- Quasi-Static Mechanical Biomimetics Evaluation of Car Crash Dummy Skin.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Mathematical Models for Ultrasound Elastography: Recent Advances to Improve Accuracy and Clinical Utility.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- A Comprehensive Review on the Viscoelastic Parameters Used for Engineering Materials, Including Soft Materials, and the Relationships between Different Damping Parameters.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Ultrasound Shear Elastography With Expanded Bandwidth (USEWEB): A Novel Method for 2D Shear Phase Velocity Imaging of Soft Tissues.IEEE transactions on medical imaging · 2024Article
- Evaluation of Robustness of S-Transform Based Phase Velocity Estimation in Viscoelastic Phantoms and Renal Transplants.IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering · 2024Article
- Article
- Merging Single-Track Location Elastographic Imaging with the Frequency Shift Method improves Shear Wave Attenuation Measurements.Frontiers in physics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Elastography researchers have utilized several rheological models to characterize soft tissue viscoelasticity over the past thirty years. Due to the frequency-dependent behavior of viscoelastic parameters as well as the different techniques and frequencies employed in various studies of soft tissues, rheological models have value in standardizing disparate techniques via explicit mathematical representations. However, the important question remains: which of the several available models should be considered for widespread adoption within a theoretical framework? We address this by evaluating the performance of three well established rheological models to characterize ex vivo bovine liver tissues: the Kelvin-Voigt (KV) model as a 2-parameter model, and the standard linear solid (SLS) and Kelvin-Voigt fractional derivative (KVFD) models as 3-parameter models. The assessments were based on the analysis of time domain behavior (using stress relaxation tests) and frequency domain behavior (by measuring shear wave speed (SWS) dispersion). SWS was measured over a wide range of frequency from 1 Hz to 1 kHz using three different tests: (i) harmonic shear tests using a rheometer, (ii) reverberant shear wave (RSW) ultrasound elastography scans, and (iii) RSW optical coherence elastography scans, with each test targeting a distinct frequency range. Our results demonstrated that the KVFD model produces the only mutually consistent rendering of time and frequency domain data for liver. Furthermore, it reduces to a 2-parameter model for liver (correspondingly to a 2-parameter "spring-pot" or power-law model for SWS dispersion) and provides the most accurate predictions of the material viscoelastic behavior in time (>98% accuracy) and frequency (>96% accuracy) domains. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: Rheological models are applied in quantifying tissues viscoelastic properties. This study is unique in presenting comprehensive assessments of rheological models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.