Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35525481›Full record

ArticleActa biomaterialia2022

Comprehensive experimental assessments of rheological models' performance in elastography of soft tissues.

Sedigheh S Poul, Juvenal Ormachea, Gary R Ge, Kevin J Parker

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta biomaterialia, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sedigheh S PoulDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14627, USA.
Juvenal OrmacheaDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14627, USA.
Gary R GeInstitute of Optics, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14627, USA.
Kevin J ParkerDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14627, USA. Electronic address: kevin.parker@rochester.edu.
University of Rochester · US

Funding

Advanced Brain OCT ElastographyR21AG070331 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI PARKER, KEVIN J · 2020 to 2020
$422k
The H-scan approach to classifying ultrasound echoesR21EB025290 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI PARKER, KEVIN J · 2018 to 2019
$420k
Investigation of Brain Elasticity in Aging and Alzheimer's Disease Enabled by Optical Coherence ElastographyF30AG069293 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI GE, GARY RUIAN · 2020 to 2023
$206k
NIA NIH HHS F30 AG069293NIA NIH HHS R21 AG070331NIBIB NIH HHS R21 EB025290
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Elastography researchers have utilized several rheological models to characterize soft tissue viscoelasticity over the past thirty years. Due to the frequency-dependent behavior of viscoelastic parameters as well as the different techniques and frequencies employed in various studies of soft tissues, rheological models have value in standardizing disparate techniques via explicit mathematical representations. However, the important question remains: which of the several available models should be considered for widespread adoption within a theoretical framework? We address this by evaluating the performance of three well established rheological models to characterize ex vivo bovine liver tissues: the Kelvin-Voigt (KV) model as a 2-parameter model, and the standard linear solid (SLS) and Kelvin-Voigt fractional derivative (KVFD) models as 3-parameter models. The assessments were based on the analysis of time domain behavior (using stress relaxation tests) and frequency domain behavior (by measuring shear wave speed (SWS) dispersion). SWS was measured over a wide range of frequency from 1 Hz to 1 kHz using three different tests: (i) harmonic shear tests using a rheometer, (ii) reverberant shear wave (RSW) ultrasound elastography scans, and (iii) RSW optical coherence elastography scans, with each test targeting a distinct frequency range. Our results demonstrated that the KVFD model produces the only mutually consistent rendering of time and frequency domain data for liver. Furthermore, it reduces to a 2-parameter model for liver (correspondingly to a 2-parameter "spring-pot" or power-law model for SWS dispersion) and provides the most accurate predictions of the material viscoelastic behavior in time (>98% accuracy) and frequency (>96% accuracy) domains. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: Rheological models are applied in quantifying tissues viscoelastic properties. This study is unique in presenting comprehensive assessments of rheological models.

Indexed as

Elasticity Imaging TechniquesAnimalsCattleLiverPhantoms, ImagingRheologyUltrasonographyViscosityElastographyRheological modelShear wave speed dispersionStress relaxationViscoelastic soft tissues

Identifiers

PMID35525481
PMCPMC9335515
OpenAlexW4229077816

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.