Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35525081›Full record

ArticleAtencion primaria2022

[Medication safety during the COVID-19 pandemic in primary care nurses].

Francisco Miguel Escandell Rico, Lucía Pérez Fernández

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Atencion primaria, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Francisco Miguel Escandell RicoDepartamento de Enfermería, Universidad de Alicante, Alicante, España. Electronic address: francisco.escandell@ua.es.
Lucía Pérez FernándezCentro de Salud Almoradí, Departamento de Salud 21, Orihuela, Alicante, España.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo know the perception of nurses about the factors that influence the safe administration of medications during the COVID-19 period, in the work context in a primary care health department of the Spanish national health system.

designThis is a qualitative phenomenological study. SITE: Carried out in the Department of Health 21 (Alicante, Spain) between the months of September 2021 and November 2021.

participantsFifteen nurses chosen by intentional sampling.

methodsA semi-structured interview lasting between 30 and 60min was used, recorded and transcribed verbatim by the research team. A main category called "know" is established, which encompasses all the reflections about the nurse's performance during the medication administration process.

resultsThe participants expressed concern about the performance of medication administration procedures, which made it possible to perceive safety as the greatest concern in the study unit. From this main category, the following subcategories are developed: work overload, insufficient training, distractions and communication and information failures.

conclusionKnowing the perception of nurses about the factors that influence the safe administration of medications could facilitate the use of instruments to standardize and reduce variability in the safe administration of medications. As well as improving conditions in work environments at the community level, and not favoring social, personal and professional stigmatization due to care error.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 Drug TreatmentNursesPrimary Care NursingHumansMedication ErrorsPandemicsQualitative ResearchEnfermeraErrorMedicamentoMedicineNurseSecuritySeguridad

Identifiers

PMID35525081
PMCPMC8938186

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.