ArticleEJNMMI research2022
Localization of TSH-secreting pituitary adenoma using 11C-methionine image subtraction.
Article in EJNMMI research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06701838 (Osilodrostat Therapy and 11C-methionine PET to IMprove Corticotroph Pituitary Adenoma Detection and Localisation in Patients With Cushing's Disease), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Osilodrostat Therapy and 11C-methionine PET to IMprove Corticotroph Pituitary Adenoma Detection and Localisation in Patients With Cushing's Disease
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Functional pituitary adenoma imaging.Reviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders · 2026Review
- The clinical value of [Pituitary · 2026Observational
- Enhanced Radiological Detection of a Corticotroph Adenoma Following Treatment With Osilodrostat.JCEM case reports · 2025Article
- The Use of [Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Approach to the Patient With Raised Thyroid Hormones and Nonsuppressed TSH.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2024Article
- Multidisciplinary Team Care in Pituitary Tumours.Cancers · 2024Review
- Development of a bespoke phantom to optimize molecular PET imaging of pituitary tumors.EJNMMI physics · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPituitary adenomas (PA) affect ~ 1:1200 of the population and can cause a wide range of symptoms due to hormone over-secretion, loss of normal pituitary gland function and/or compression of visual pathways, resulting in significantly impaired quality of life. Surgery is potentially curative if the location of the adenoma can be determined. However, standard structural (anatomical) imaging, in the form of MRI, is unable to locate all tumors, especially microadenomas (< 1 cm diameter). In such cases, functional imaging [
resultsWe found that the mean percentage differences in maximum pituitary uptake between two Met-PET scans in healthy volunteers were 2.4% for (SUVr) [cerebellum], 8.8% for SUVr [pons], 5.2% for SUVr [gray matter] and 23.1% for the SUVbw [no region]. Laterality, as measured by contrast-noise ratio (CNR), indicated the correct location of the adenoma in all three image types with mean CNR values of 6.2, 8.1 and 11.1 for SUVbw, SUVbwSub and SUVrSub [cerebellum], respectively. Subtraction imaging improved CNR in 60% and 100% of patients when using images generated from SUVbw [no region] and SUVr [cerebellum] scans compared to standard clinical SUVbw imaging.
conclusionsMet-PET scans should be normalized to the cerebellum to minimize the effects of physiological variation in pituitary gland uptake of 11C-methionine, especially when comparing serial imaging. Subtraction imaging following endocrine suppression of tumor function improved lateralization of PA when compared with single time point clinical Met-PET but, importantly, only if the images were normalized to the cerebellum prior to subtraction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.