Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35524866›Full record

ArticleCognitive research: principles and implications2022

Prior experience with target encounter affects attention allocation and prospective memory performance.

Kara N Moore, James Michael Lampinen, Eryn J Adams, Blake L Nesmith, Presley Burch

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cognitive research: principles and implications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kara N MooreOklahoma State University, 116 Psychology Building, Stillwater, OK, 74078, USA. kara.moore@okstate.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-7289-4934
James Michael Lampinen216 Memorial Hall, Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, 72701, USA.
Eryn J Adams210 McAlester Hall, Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA.
Blake L NesmithOklahoma State University, 116 Psychology Building, Stillwater, OK, 74078, USA.
Presley BurchOklahoma State University, 116 Psychology Building, Stillwater, OK, 74078, USA.
Oklahoma State University · USUniversity of Arkansas at Fayetteville · USUniversity of Missouri · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We examined how prior experience encountering targets affected attention allocation and event-based prospective memory. Participants performed four color match task blocks with a difficult, but specified prospective memory task (Experiment 1) or an easier, but unspecified prospective memory task (Experiment 2). Participants were instructed to search for targets on each block. Participants in the prior experience condition saw targets on each block, participants in the no prior experience condition only saw targets on the fourth block, and, in Experiment 2, participants in the mixed prior experience condition encountered some of the targets on the first three blocks, and saw all the targets on the fourth block. In Experiment 1, participants in the no prior experience condition were less accurate at recognizing targets and quicker to respond on ongoing task trials than participants in the prior experience condition. In Experiment 2, we replicated the effect of prior experience on target accuracy, but there was no effect on ongoing trial response time. The mixed experience condition did not vary from the other conditions on either dependent variable, but their target accuracy varied in accordance with their experience. These findings demonstrate that prospective memory performance is influenced by experience with related tasks, thus extending our understanding of the dynamic nature of search efforts across related prospective memory tasks. This research has implications for understanding prospective memory in applied settings where targets do not reliably occur such as baggage screenings and missing person searches.

Indexed as

Memory, EpisodicAttentionCognitionHumansReaction TimeExpectationsExperienceFrequencyMeta-cognitionPrevalenceProspective memory

Identifiers

PMID35524866
PMCPMC9077979
OpenAlexW4229034453

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.