ArticleEuropean radiology2022
Automated segmentation of whole-body CT images for body composition analysis in pediatric patients using a deep neural network.
Article in European radiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Artificial intelligence for body composition assessment focusing on sarcopenia.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- The challenges of assessing adiposity in a clinical setting.Nature reviews. Endocrinology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo develop an automatic segmentation algorithm using a deep neural network with transfer learning applicable to whole-body PET-CT images in children.
methodsFor model development, we utilized transfer learning with a pre-trained model based on adult patients. We used CT images of 31 pediatric patients under 19 years of age (mean age, 9.6 years) who underwent PET-CT from institution #1 for transfer learning. Two radiologists manually labeled the skin, bone, muscle, abdominal visceral fat, subcutaneous fat, internal organs, and central nervous system in each CT slice and used these as references. For external validation, we collected 14 pediatric PET/CT scans from institution #2 (mean age, 9.1 years). The Dice similarity coefficients (DSCs), sensitivities, and precision were compared between the algorithms before and after transfer learning. In addition, we evaluated segmentation performance according to sex, age (≤ 8 vs. > 8 years), and body mass index (BMI, ≤ 20 vs. > 20 kg/m
resultsThe algorithm after transfer learning showed better performance than the algorithm before transfer learning for all body compositions (p < 0.001). The average DSC, sensitivity, and precision of each algorithm before and after transfer learning were 98.23% and 99.28%, 98.16% and 99.28%, and 98.29% and 99.28%, respectively. The segmentation performance of the algorithm was generally not affected by age, sex, or BMI, except for precision in the body muscle compartment.
conclusionThe developed model with transfer learning enabled accurate and fully automated segmentation of multiple tissues on whole-body CT scans in children. KEY POINTS: • We utilized transfer learning with a pre-trained segmentation algorithm for adult to develop an algorithm for automated segmentation of pediatric whole-body CT. • This algorithm showed excellent performance and was not affected by sex, age, or body mass index, except for precision in body muscle.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.