Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35524686›Full record

ArticleFEMS microbiology ecology2022

Protist feeding patterns and growth rate are related to their predatory impacts on soil bacterial communities.

Nathalie Amacker, Zhilei Gao, Jie Hu, Alexandre L C Jousset, George A Kowalchuk, Stefan Geisen

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in FEMS microbiology ecology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
7.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Movement of bacteria in the soil and the rhizosphere.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Nathalie AmackerEcology and Biodiversity group, Institute of Environmental Biology, University of Utrecht, Padualaan 8, 3584 CH Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4773-180X
Zhilei GaoEcology and Biodiversity group, Institute of Environmental Biology, University of Utrecht, Padualaan 8, 3584 CH Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Jie HuEcology and Biodiversity group, Institute of Environmental Biology, University of Utrecht, Padualaan 8, 3584 CH Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Alexandre L C JoussetEcology and Biodiversity group, Institute of Environmental Biology, University of Utrecht, Padualaan 8, 3584 CH Utrecht, The Netherlands.
George A KowalchukEcology and Biodiversity group, Institute of Environmental Biology, University of Utrecht, Padualaan 8, 3584 CH Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Stefan GeisenLaboratory of Nematology, Wageningen University & Research, 6700 ES Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Utrecht University · NLCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRWageningen University & Research · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Predatory protists are major consumers of soil micro-organisms. By selectively feeding on their prey, they can shape soil microbiome composition and functions. While different protists are known to show diverging impacts, it remains impossible to predict a priori the effect of a given species. Various protist traits including phylogenetic distance, growth rate and volume have been previously linked to the predatory impact of protists. Closely related protists, however, also showed distinct prey choices which could mirror specificity in their dietary niche. We, therefore, aimed to estimate the dietary niche breadth and overlap of eight protist isolates on 20 bacterial species in plate assays. To assess the informative value of previously suggested and newly proposed (feeding-related) protist traits, we related them to the impacts of predation of each protist on a protist-free soil bacterial community in a soil microcosm via 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing. We could demonstrate that each protist showed a distinct feeding pattern in vitro. Further, the assayed protist feeding patterns and growth rates correlated well with the observed predatory impacts on the structure of soil bacterial communities. We thus conclude that in vitro screening has the potential to inform on the specific predatory impact of selected protists.

Indexed as

Predatory BehaviorSoilAnimalsBacteriaEukaryotaFeeding BehaviorPhylogenyRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSoildietary nichein vitro assaymicrobesmicrocosmpredationsoil

Identifiers

PMID35524686
PMCPMC9126823
OpenAlexW4229334905

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.