Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35524614›Full record

ArticleWorld psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA)2022

Reappraising the variability of effects of antipsychotic medication in schizophrenia: a meta-analysis.

Robert A McCutcheon, Toby Pillinger, Orestis Efthimiou, Marta Maslej, Benoit H Mulsant, Allan H Young, Andrea Cipriani, Oliver D Howes

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06856161 (A Novel Blood Test as a Differential Diagnosis and Drug Efficacy Biomarker in Mental Health), which is not on this map. Cited by 31 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06856161 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

A Novel Blood Test as a Differential Diagnosis and Drug Efficacy Biomarker in Mental Health

TypeobservationalSponsorFraser HealthRan2025 to 2027Enrolled500ConditionsDepression - Major Depressive Disorder, Schizophenia Disorder, Psychosis, Mania (Neurotic)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Treatment resistance in first-episode psychosis.World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Glutamatergic basis of antipsychotic response in first-episode psychosis: a dual voxel study of the anterior cingulate cortex.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2024
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Robert A McCutcheonInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, Department of Psychosis Studies, King's College of London, London, UK.
Toby PillingerInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, Department of Psychosis Studies, King's College of London, London, UK.
Orestis EfthimiouInstitute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Marta MaslejKrembil Centre for Neuroinformatics, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Benoit H MulsantCentre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Allan H YoungInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, Department of Psychological Medicine, King's College of London, London, UK.
Andrea CiprianiDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Oliver D HowesPsychiatric Imaging Group, MRC London Institute of Medical Sciences, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College London, London, UK.

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_U120097115Medical Research Council MR/N027078/1Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is common experience for practising psychiatrists that individuals with schizophrenia vary markedly in their symptomatic response to antipsychotic medication. What is not clear, however, is whether this variation reflects variability of medication-specific effects (also called "treatment effect heterogeneity"), as opposed to variability of non-specific effects such as natural symptom fluctuation or placebo response. Previous meta-analyses found no evidence of treatment effect heterogeneity, suggesting that a "one size fits all" approach may be appropriate and that efforts at developing personalized treatment strategies for schizophrenia are unlikely to succeed. Recent advances indicate, however, that earlier approaches may have been unable to accurately quantify treatment effect heterogeneity due to their neglect of a key parameter: the correlation between placebo response and medication-specific effects. In the present paper, we address this shortcoming by using individual patient data and study-level data to estimate that correlation and quantitatively characterize antipsychotic treatment effect heterogeneity in schizophrenia. Individual patient data (on 384 individuals who were administered antipsychotic treatment and 88 who received placebo) were obtained from the Yale University Open Data Access (YODA) database. Study-level data were obtained from a meta-analysis of 66 clinical trials including 17,202 patients. Both individual patient and study-level analyses yielded a negative correlation between placebo response and treatment effect for the total score on the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) (ρ=-0.32, p=0.002 and ρ=-0.39, p<0.001, respectively). Using the most conservative of these estimates, a meta-analysis of treatment effect heterogeneity provided evidence of a marked variability in antipsychotic-specific effects between individuals with schizophrenia, with the top quartile of patients experiencing beneficial treatment effects of 17.7 points or more on the PANSS total score, while the bottom quartile presented a detrimental effect of treatment relative to placebo. This evidence of clinically meaningful treatment effect heterogeneity suggests that efforts to personalize antipsychotic treatment of schizophrenia have potential for success.

Indexed as

Antipsychotic medicationmedication-specific effectsnon-specific effectspersonalization of treatmentplacebo responseprecision medicineschizophreniatreatment effect heterogeneityvariability of effects

Identifiers

PMID35524614
PMCPMC9077611

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.