Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35524568›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2022

scIMC: a platform for benchmarking comparison and visualization analysis of scRNA-seq data imputation methods.

Chichi Dai, Yi Jiang, Chenglin Yin, Ran Su, Xiangxiang Zeng, Quan Zou, Kenta Nakai, Leyi Wei

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. scCADI: Cell-Aware Diffusion Model for Single-Cell RNA-seq Imputation.Interdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Chichi DaiCollege of Intelligence and Computing, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China.
Yi JiangSchool of Software, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Chenglin YinSchool of Software, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Ran SuCollege of Intelligence and Computing, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5922-0364
Xiangxiang ZengCollege of Computer Science and Electronic Engineering, Hunan University, Changsha, China.ORCID 0000-0003-1081-7658
Quan ZouInstitute of Fundamental and Frontier Sciences, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, China.ORCID 0000-0001-6406-1142
Kenta NakaiHuman Genome Center, Institute of Medical Science, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-8721-8883
Leyi WeiSchool of Software, Shandong University, Jinan, China.ORCID 0000-0003-1444-190X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the advent of single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq), one major challenging is the so-called 'dropout' events that distort gene expression and remarkably influence downstream analysis in single-cell transcriptome. To address this issue, much effort has been done and several scRNA-seq imputation methods were developed with two categories: model-based and deep learning-based. However, comprehensively and systematically comparing existing methods are still lacking. In this work, we use six simulated and two real scRNA-seq datasets to comprehensively evaluate and compare a total of 12 available imputation methods from the following four aspects: (i) gene expression recovering, (ii) cell clustering, (iii) gene differential expression, and (iv) cellular trajectory reconstruction. We demonstrate that deep learning-based approaches generally exhibit better overall performance than model-based approaches under major benchmarking comparison, indicating the power of deep learning for imputation. Importantly, we built scIMC (single-cell Imputation Methods Comparison platform), the first online platform that integrates all available state-of-the-art imputation methods for benchmarking comparison and visualization analysis, which is expected to be a convenient and useful tool for researchers of interest. It is now freely accessible via https://server.wei-group.net/scIMC/.

Indexed as

Gene Expression ProfilingSequence Analysis, RNASingle-Cell AnalysisCluster AnalysisSoftware

Identifiers

PMID35524568
PMCPMC9122610

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.