Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35524398›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2022

Towards better reporting of the proportion of days covered method in cardiovascular medication adherence: A scoping review and new tool TEN-SPIDERS.

Lachlan L Dalli, Monique F Kilkenny, Isabelle Arnet, Frank M Sanfilippo, Doyle M Cummings, Moira K Kapral, Joosup Kim, Jan Cameron, Kevin Y Yap, Melanie Greenland and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
11.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Rapid Access Atrial Fibrillation Clinics in Australia - Modelling Outcomes and Cost-Effectiveness.American journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 8 institutions in 6 countries.

Lachlan L DalliStroke and Ageing Research, Department of Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Victoria.ORCID 0000-0003-1449-9132
Monique F KilkennyStroke and Ageing Research, Department of Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Victoria.ORCID 0000-0002-3375-287X
Isabelle ArnetDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-7591-4104
Frank M SanfilippoSchool of Population and Global Health, The University of Western Australia, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3639-0787
Doyle M CummingsDepartment of Family Medicine, Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8237-7885
Moira K KapralICES, Toronto, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-3444-9928
Joosup KimStroke and Ageing Research, Department of Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Victoria.ORCID 0000-0002-4079-0428
Jan CameronStroke and Ageing Research, Department of Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Victoria.ORCID 0000-0002-3335-904X
Kevin Y YapDepartment of Pharmacy, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0001-7322-4396
Melanie GreenlandOxford Vaccine Group, Department of Paediatrics, Centre for Clinical Vaccinology and Tropical Medicine, Churchill Hospital, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9363-8844
Dominique A CadilhacStroke and Ageing Research, Department of Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Victoria.ORCID 0000-0001-8162-682X
The University of Melbourne · AUMonash Health · AUChurchill Hospital · GBEast Carolina University · USLa Trobe University · AUThe University of Western Australia · AUUniversity of Basel · CHUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although medication adherence is commonly measured in electronic datasets using the proportion of days covered (PDC), no standardized approach is used to calculate and report this measure. We conducted a scoping review to understand the approaches taken to calculate and report the PDC for cardiovascular medicines to develop improved guidance for researchers using this measure. After prespecifying methods in a registered protocol, we searched Ovid Medline, Embase, Scopus, CINAHL Plus and grey literature (1 July 2012 to 14 December 2020) for articles containing the terms "proportion of days covered" and "cardiovascular medicine", or synonyms and subject headings. Of the 523 articles identified, 316 were reviewed in full and 76 were included (93% observational studies; 47% from the USA; 2 grey literature articles). In 45 articles (59%), the PDC was measured from the first dispensing/claim date. Good adherence was defined as 80% PDC in 61 articles, 56% of which contained a rationale for selecting this threshold. The following parameters, important for deriving the PDC, were often not reported/unclear: switching (53%), early refills (45%), in-hospital supplies (45%), presupply (28%) and survival (7%). Of the 46 articles where dosing information was unavailable, 59% reported how doses were imputed. To improve the transparent and systematic reporting of the PDC, we propose the TEN-SPIDERS tool, covering the following PDC parameters: Threshold, Eligibility criteria, Numerator and denominator, Survival, Presupply, In-hospital supplies, Dosing, Early Refills, and Switching. Use of this tool will standardize reporting of the PDC to facilitate reliable comparisons of medication adherence estimates between studies.

Indexed as

SpidersAnimalsMedication AdherenceRetrospective Studiescardiovascular diseasedrug utilizationmedication adherencemethodspharmacoepidemiologyscoping review

Identifiers

PMID35524398
PMCPMC9546055
OpenAlexW4229020831

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.