ArticleBMC oral health2022
Efficiency of biofilm removal by combination of water jet and cold plasma: an in-vitro study.
Article in BMC oral health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cold atmospheric plasma for implant surface decontamination and osseointegration: a scoping review with implications for peri-implantitis management.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Evaluation of the Inactivation of Microorganisms by a Blue Laser (445 nm)-An In Vitro Study.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Trypan Blue Image-Guided Removal of Surface-Based Bacterial Biofilms from Chicken Tissue Using Cold Atmospheric Pressure Plasma.Plasma (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Exploring the Efficacy of Low-Temperature Plasmas on Oral Biofilms: A Scoping Review.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Efficacy of oral irrigators compared to other interdental aids for managing peri-implant diseases: a systematic review.BDJ open · 2025Article
- Effectiveness of cold atmospheric plasma in decontaminating enterococcus faecalis colonized collagen and PTFE membranes used in guided bone regeneration: a comparative in vitro investigation.International journal of implant dentistry · 2024Article
- Sublethal Damage Caused by Cold Plasma onFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Training in the use of the water jet and cold atmospheric plasma jet for the decontamination of dental implants.Clinical oral investigations · 2024Article
- Oral Irrigation Devices: A Scoping Review.Clinical and experimental dental research · 2024Article
- In-vitro biofilm removal from TiUnite® implant surface with an air polishing and two different plasma devices.BMC oral health · 2024Article
- Nonthermal Atmospheric Pressure Plasma Treatment of Endosteal Implants for Osseointegration and Antimicrobial Efficacy: A Comprehensive Review.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Effects of Cold Atmospheric Plasma Pre-Treatment of Titanium on the Biological Activity of Primary Human Gingival Fibroblasts.Biomedicines · 2023Article
- In-Vitro Biofilm Removal Efficacy Using Water Jet in Combination with Cold Plasma Technology on Dental Titanium Implants.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Influence of Clinical Decontamination Techniques on the Surface Characteristics of SLA Titanium Implant.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPeri-implantitis therapy is a major problem in implantology. Because of challenging rough implant surface and implant geometry, microorganisms can hide and survive in implant microstructures and impede debridement. We developed a new water jet (WJ) device and a new cold atmospheric pressure plasma (CAP) device to overcome these problems and investigated aspects of efficacy in vitro and safety with the aim to create the prerequisites for a clinical pilot study with these medical devices.
methodsWe compared the efficiency of a single treatment with a WJ or curette and cotton swab (CC) without or with adjunctive use of CAP (WJ + CAP, CC + CAP) to remove biofilm in vitro from rough titanium discs. Treatment efficacy was evaluated by measuring turbidity up to 72 h for bacterial re-growth or spreading of osteoblast-like cells (MG-63) after 5 days with scanning electron microscopy. With respect to application safety, the WJ and CAP instruments were examined according to basic regulations for medical devices.
resultsAfter 96 h of incubation all WJ and CC treated disks were turbid but 67% of WJ + CAP and 46% CC + CAP treated specimens were still clear. The increase in turbidity after WJ treatment was delayed by about 20 h compared to CC treatment. In combination with CAP the cell coverage significantly increased to 82% (WJ + CAP) or 72% (CC + CAP), compared to single treatment 11% (WJ) or 10% (CC).
conclusionThe newly developed water jet device effectively removes biofilm from rough titanium surfaces in vitro and, in combination with the new CAP device, biologically acceptable surfaces allow osteoblasts to grow. WJ in combination with CAP leads to cleaner surfaces than the usage of curette and cotton swabs with or without subsequent plasma treatment. Our next step will be a clinical pilot study with these new devices to assess the clinical healing process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.