Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35524305›Full record

ReviewBMC biology2022

Symbiont transmission in marine sponges: reproduction, development, and metamorphosis.

Tyler J Carrier, Manuel Maldonado, Lara Schmittmann, Lucía Pita, Thomas C G Bosch, Ute Hentschel

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMC biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The archaeal classmBio · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The chromosomal genome sequence of the spongeWellcome open research · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tyler J CarrierGEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research, Kiel, Germany. tcarrier@geomar.de.ORCID 0000-0001-7885-184X
Manuel MaldonadoDepartment of Marine Ecology, Center for Advanced Studies of Blanes (CEAB-CSIC), Girona, Spain.
Lara SchmittmannGEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research, Kiel, Germany.
Lucía PitaGEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research, Kiel, Germany.
Thomas C G BoschZoological Institute, University of Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
Ute HentschelGEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research, Kiel, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Marine sponges (phylum Porifera) form symbioses with diverse microbial communities that can be transmitted between generations through their developmental stages. Here, we integrate embryology and microbiology to review how symbiotic microorganisms are transmitted in this early-diverging lineage. We describe that vertical transmission is widespread but not universal, that microbes are vertically transmitted during a select developmental window, and that properties of the developmental microbiome depends on whether a species is a high or low microbial abundance sponge. Reproduction, development, and symbiosis are thus deeply rooted, but why these partnerships form remains the central and elusive tenet of these developmental symbioses.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaPoriferaAnimalsPhylogenyReproductionRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSymbiosisRNA, Ribosomal, 16SEvolutionHolobiontHost-microbeInvertebrateMicrobiomePorifera

Identifiers

PMID35524305
PMCPMC9077847

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.