Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35524298›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2022

Worksite tobacco control - a qualitative study on perspectives from employers and employees at small worksites.

Christine M Kava, Raymond A Ruiz, Jeffrey R Harris, Peggy A Hannon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Christine M KavaDepartment of Health Systems and Population Health, University of Washington School of Public Health, Seattle, WA, USA. ckava@uw.edu.
Raymond A RuizDepartment of Health Systems and Population Health, University of Washington School of Public Health, Seattle, WA, USA.
Jeffrey R HarrisDepartment of Health Systems and Population Health, University of Washington School of Public Health, Seattle, WA, USA.
Peggy A HannonDepartment of Health Systems and Population Health, University of Washington School of Public Health, Seattle, WA, USA.

Funding

Increasing Implementation of Evidence-Based Interventions at Low-Wage WorksitesR01CA160217 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI HANNON, MARGARET A · 2012 to 2022
$5.6M
Biobehavioral Cancer Prevention and Control Training Program (BCPT)T32CA092408 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Margaret A Hannon · 2016 to 2026
$2.3M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA160217NCI NIH HHS T32 CA092408
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEvidence-based interventions (EBIs) for tobacco control can be implemented in worksite settings to reduce tobacco use. Small worksites are less likely to adopt tobacco control EBIs than large worksites. The purpose of this qualitative study was to 1) explore factors that impact small employers' decisions to offer tobacco control EBIs, and 2) understand employees' perceptions of tobacco control at small worksites.

methodsWorking with staff from small worksites (20-250 employees), we analyzed data from 12 semi-structured interviews with employers (via key informants) and four focus groups with employees. We recruited employers and employees through a purchased business list and market research company, respectively. Interview and focus group topics included perceptions of worksite tobacco control; internal and external forces shaping worksite tobacco control implementation; and perceived worksite support for cessation. We conducted thematic data analysis.

resultsKey themes from the employer interviews included: the local environment played an important role in implementation of tobacco control EBIs; tobacco control was perceived as important but not a priority; and tobacco control decisions were driven by worksite culture. Key themes from the employee focus groups included: perceived employer support for tobacco cessation was limited although there was interest from employees; employees who currently used tobacco were stigmatized for their behavior; and incentives and coaching were considered ideal tobacco control EBIs.

conclusionsTobacco control has not been prioritized at small worksites, despite employees welcoming additional cessation support. This study contributes important information on contextual factors and employee preferences that could be targeted to improve tobacco control EBI implementation. Worksites should implement comprehensive tobacco-free policies, minimize stigma when promoting cessation, establish equitable break policies, and involve employees in decision-making related to tobacco control.

Indexed as

WorkplaceHealth BehaviorHealth PromotionHumansTobacco ProductsTobacco UseEmployeesEmployersEvidence-based interventionImplementationSmall workplacesTobaccoTobacco control

Identifiers

PMID35524298
PMCPMC9073486

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.