ArticleBMC public health2022
Understanding public attitudes to death talk and advance care planning in Northern Ireland using health behaviour change theory: a qualitative study.
Article in BMC public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- Operationalising palliative care integration: Experiences of implementers in South Africa.African journal of primary health care & family medicine · 2026Article
- Intergenerational communication about advance care planning between older adults and their adult children: a qualitative dyadic study.BMC geriatrics · 2026Article
- Family communication, death taboo, and advance directives: a cross-sectional study of institutionalized older adults in China.BMC palliative care · 2026Article
- The Role of Advance Care Planning on Community Dwelling Adults' Coping Abilities and Death Attitudes: A Sequential Mixed-Methods Study.Journal of clinical nursing · 2026Article
- Death literacy: A document analysis review of the United Kingdom's four countries' policies.Palliative care and social practice · 2026Review
- Growing palliative and end-of-life care research in the United Kingdom: Findings from a mixed methods survey.PloS one · 2026Article
- Barriers and facilitators to advance care planning for people with intellectual disabilities: a cross-sectional survey study of professional caregiver perspectives.International journal for equity in health · 2025Article
- Adopting the lens of the COM-B behaviour change model to qualitatively explore and understand public health implications of young adults' attitudes towards death-talk.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Factors Influencing Knowledge, Attitudes and Behaviour Towards Engaging with Advance Care Planning: A Cross-Sectional Survey of Chinese Diaspora.Journal of palliative care · 2025Article
- The Cost of Dying Exhibition: public, professional and political reactions to a visual exhibition depicting experiences of poverty at the end of life.Medical humanities · 2025Article
- Latent Profiles of Advance Care Planning Engagement and Death Attitudes in Dialysis Patients with End-Stage Renal Disease.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2025Article
- Attitudes of the Portuguese population towards advance directives: an online survey.BMC medical ethics · 2024Article
- Advance Directives in Portugal: A Qualitative Survey.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Public perceptions of advance care planning (ACP) from an international perspective: a scoping review.BMC palliative care · 2023Article
- Psychometric validation of the death literacy index and benchmarking of death literacy level in a representative uk population sample.BMC palliative care · 2022Article
- Death cafés as a strategy to foster compassionate communities: Contributions for death and grief literacy.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesAdvance care planning is a key preparatory step in ensuring high-quality palliative and end of life care, and should be considered as a process, beginning with community-level conversations among lay persons. There is, however, indication that death talk among community-dwelling adults is not occurring, and there is a dearth of research examining why this is the case. This study aims to provide the first examination of barriers and facilitators to talking about death and dying among the general population in a UK region (Northern Ireland), and to provide a novel application of health behaviour change theory towards developing a theoretical understanding of the sources of this behaviour.
methodsThe study involved qualitative analysis of responses (n = 381 participants) to two open-ended questions within a cross-sectional online survey, with recruitment via social media of adults currently living in Northern Ireland. Reflexive thematic analysis was conducted on open text responses per question, with the barriers and facilitators mapped on to health behaviour change models (the Behaviour Change Wheel COM-B and the Theoretical Domains Framework).
resultsThe findings evidence a myriad of barriers and facilitators to engaging in death talk, with themes aligning to areas such as lack of acceptance of death in social contexts and fear of upsetting self or others, and a need to improve interpersonal communication skills for facilitating conversations and improve knowledge of the existing services around death and dying. A theoretical understanding of the drivers of death talk is presented with findings mapped across most components of the COM-B Behaviour Change Model and the Theoretical Domains Framework.
conclusionsThis study contributes to a small but emergent research area examining barriers and facilitators to talking about death and dying. Findings from this study can be used to inform new public health programmes towards empowering adults to have these conversations with others in their community towards upstreaming advance care planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.