Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35524295›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2022

Understanding public attitudes to death talk and advance care planning in Northern Ireland using health behaviour change theory: a qualitative study.

L Graham-Wisener, A Nelson, A Byrne, I Islam, C Harrison, J Geddis, E Berry

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Operationalising palliative care integration: Experiences of implementers in South Africa.African journal of primary health care & family medicine · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Advance Directives in Portugal: A Qualitative Survey.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

L Graham-WisenerCentre for Improving Health-Related Quality of Life, School of Psychology, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK. l.graham-wisener@qub.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-6311-4978
A NelsonMarie Curie Palliative Care Research Centre, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
A ByrneMarie Curie Palliative Care Research Centre, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
I IslamMarie Curie Palliative Care Research Centre, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
C HarrisonMarie Curie Northern Ireland, Belfast, UK.
J GeddisCentre for Improving Health-Related Quality of Life, School of Psychology, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.
E BerryCentre for Improving Health-Related Quality of Life, School of Psychology, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.
Marie Curie · GBQueen's University Belfast · GB

Funding

Marie Curie MCCC-FCO-11-C
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesAdvance care planning is a key preparatory step in ensuring high-quality palliative and end of life care, and should be considered as a process, beginning with community-level conversations among lay persons. There is, however, indication that death talk among community-dwelling adults is not occurring, and there is a dearth of research examining why this is the case. This study aims to provide the first examination of barriers and facilitators to talking about death and dying among the general population in a UK region (Northern Ireland), and to provide a novel application of health behaviour change theory towards developing a theoretical understanding of the sources of this behaviour.

methodsThe study involved qualitative analysis of responses (n = 381 participants) to two open-ended questions within a cross-sectional online survey, with recruitment via social media of adults currently living in Northern Ireland. Reflexive thematic analysis was conducted on open text responses per question, with the barriers and facilitators mapped on to health behaviour change models (the Behaviour Change Wheel COM-B and the Theoretical Domains Framework).

resultsThe findings evidence a myriad of barriers and facilitators to engaging in death talk, with themes aligning to areas such as lack of acceptance of death in social contexts and fear of upsetting self or others, and a need to improve interpersonal communication skills for facilitating conversations and improve knowledge of the existing services around death and dying. A theoretical understanding of the drivers of death talk is presented with findings mapped across most components of the COM-B Behaviour Change Model and the Theoretical Domains Framework.

conclusionsThis study contributes to a small but emergent research area examining barriers and facilitators to talking about death and dying. Findings from this study can be used to inform new public health programmes towards empowering adults to have these conversations with others in their community towards upstreaming advance care planning.

Indexed as

Advance Care PlanningAttitude to DeathAdultCross-Sectional StudiesHealth BehaviorHumansNorthern IrelandQualitative ResearchACPAdvance care planningBehaviour changeDeath and dyingPalliative carePublic health

Identifiers

PMID35524295
PMCPMC9077935
OpenAlexW4229055123

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.