ArticleBMC cancer2022
A novel and sensitive DNA methylation marker for the urine-based liquid biopsies to detect bladder cancer.
Article in BMC cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.
- Active Surveillance in Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer, the Potential Role of Biomarkers: A Systematic Review.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2024Pooled it
- Clinical effectiveness of a multitarget urine DNA test for urothelial carcinoma detection: a double-blinded, multicenter, prospective trial.Molecular cancer · 2024Trial
- Liquid biopsy in the clinical management of tumor of urinary system: current status and future developments.Cellular oncology (Dordrecht, Netherlands) · 2026Review
- Review
- Epigenetic mechanisms and steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome: The future potential for SRNS diagnosis.iScience · 2026Review
- Liquid biopsies in precision oncology for older adults with cancer.NPJ precision oncology · 2026Review
- Unleashing the potential of urine DNA methylation detection: Advancements in biomarkers, clinical applications, and emerging technologies.Current urology · 2025Article
- DNA Methylation in Bladder Cancer: Diagnostic and Therapeutic Perspectives-A Narrative Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Precise Molecular Subtyping Reveals Heterogeneity of Lung Adenocarcinoma Based on DNA Methylation.Current medicinal chemistry · 2025Article
- Epigenetic Biomarkers as a New Diagnostic Tool in Bladder Cancer-From Early Detection to Prognosis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Article
- DMRTA2 supports glioma stem-cell mediated neovascularization in glioblastoma.Cell death & disease · 2024Article
- Hypermethylation Loci of ZNF671, IRF8, and OTX1 as Potential Urine-Based Predictive Biomarkers for Bladder Cancer.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Analysis of urine cell-free DNA in bladder cancer diagnosis by emerging bioactive technologies and materials.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024Review
- Unlocking the secrets: the power of methylation-based cfDNA detection of tissue damage in organ systems.Clinical epigenetics · 2023Review
- A urinary assay for mutation and methylation biomarkers in the diagnosis and recurrence prediction of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer patients.BMC medicine · 2023Article
- Nurturing the marriages of urinary liquid biopsies and nano-diagnostics for precision urinalysis of prostate cancer.Smart medicine · 2023Review
- Biomarkers of Bladder Cancer: Cell-Free DNA, Epigenetic Modifications and Non-Coding RNAs.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Diagnostic Potential of Circulating Tumor Cells, Urinary MicroRNA, and Urinary Cell-Free DNA for Bladder Cancer: A Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBetter prognostic outcome is closely correlated with early detection of bladder cancer. Current non-invasive urianalysis relies on simultaneously testing multiple methylation markers to achieve relatively high accuracy. Therefore, we have developed an easy-to-use, convenient, and accurate single-target urine-based DNA methylation test for the malignancy.
methodsBy analyzing TCGA data, 344 candidate markers with 424 primer pairs and probe sets synthesized were systematically screened in cancer cell lines, paired tissue specimens, and urine sediments from bladder cancer patients and normal controls. The identified marker was further validated in large case-control cohorts. Wilcoxon rank sum tests and c2 tests were performed to compare methylation levels between case-control groups and correlate methylation levels with demographic and clinical characteristics. In addition, MSP, qMSP, RT-PCR, western blot analysis, and immunohistochemistry were performed to measure levels of DNA methylation, mRNA transcription, and protein expression in cancer cell lines and tissues.
resultsA top-performing DMRTA2 marker identified was tested in both discovery and validation sets, showing similar sensitivity and specificity for bladder cancer detection. Overall sensitivity in the aggregate set was 82.9%(179/216). The specificity, from a control group consisting of patients with lithangiuria, prostatoplasia, and prostatitis, is 92.5%(468/506). Notably, the methylation assay had the highest sensitivities for tumors at stages of T1(90.4%) and T2(95.0%) compared with Ta (63.0%), T3(81.8%), and T4(81.8%). Furthermore, the test showed admirable detection rate of 80.0%(24/30) for recurring cancers. While methylation was observed in 39/54(72.2%) urine samples from patients with carcinomas of renal pelvis and ureter, it was detected at extremely low rate of 6.0%(8/133) in kidney and prostate cancers. Compared with SV-HUC-1, the normal bladder epithelial cell line, DMRTA2 was hypermethylated in 8/9 bladder cancer cell lines, consistent with the results of MSP and qMSP, but not correlated with mRNA and protein expression levels in these cell lines. Similarly, DMRTA2 immunostaining was moderate in some tissues but weak in others. Further studies are needed to address functional implications of DMRTA2 hypermethylation.
conclusionsOur data demonstrated that a single-target DNA methylation signature, mDMRTA2, could be highly effective to detect both primary and recurring bladder cancer via urine samples.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.