Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35524219›Full record

Observational studyBMC cancer2022

A real-world retrospective study of the use of Ki-67 testing and treatment patterns in patients with HR+, HER2- early breast cancer in the United States.

Jacqueline Brown, Savannah Scardo, Michael Method, Dan Schlauch, Amanda Misch, Shaita Picard, Erika Hamilton, Suzanne Jones, Howard Burris, David Spigel

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Jacqueline BrownEli Lilly and Company Limited, 8 Arlington Square West, Downshire Way, Bracknell, RG12 1PU, UK. brown_jacqueline_dr@lilly.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1130-6414
Savannah ScardoEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Michael MethodEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Dan SchlauchGenospace, Boston, MA, USA.
Amanda MischGenospace, Boston, MA, USA.
Shaita PicardGenospace, Boston, MA, USA.
Erika HamiltonSarah Cannon, Nashville, TN, USA.
Suzanne JonesSarah Cannon, Nashville, TN, USA.
Howard BurrisSarah Cannon, Nashville, TN, USA.
David SpigelSarah Cannon, Nashville, TN, USA.
Sarah Cannon · USEli Lilly (United States) · USEli Lilly (United Kingdom) · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe National Comprehensive Cancer Network recommends that patients with hormone receptor-positive early breast cancer be considered for adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET) after primary treatment like surgical excision. Adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) use primarily depends on risk of recurrence. Biomarkers such as Ki-67 potentially have most value in patients with intermediate risk factors, such as involvement of 1-3 positive nodes. This study evaluated the use of Ki-67 testing and treatment patterns in patients with HR+, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative early breast cancer.

methodsThis was an observational retrospective cohort study of patients with electronic medical records from January 2010 to August 2018 treated for HR+, HER2- early breast cancer at Sarah Cannon sites in the United States (US). Overall, 567 patients were randomly selected after using the eligibility criteria: female or male ≥18 years, without distant metastases, and with available physician and pathology reports. Multivariable logistic regression was used to investigate factors predicting Ki-67 testing and test results. Descriptive analyses were applied to treatment patterns.

resultsMultivariable logistic regression analyses found no clinical or pathological factors that predicted whether Ki-67 testing had been ordered by physicians. Of all tested patients (N = 130), having Grade-2 tumors (OR, 7.95 [95% CI: 2.05, 30.9]; p = 0.0027) or Grade-3 tumors (OR, 95.3 [95% CI, 11.9, 760.7]; p < 0.001) at initial diagnosis was a predictor of high Ki-67 expression (≥20%). Ki-67 expression was tested in 23.6% (61/258) of patients with 1-3 positive nodes; 54.1% of them (33/61) had high Ki-67 expression (≥20%). While having a higher grade tumor predicted high Ki-67 (≥20%), 28.6% of patients with Grade-1 tumors also had high Ki-67 expression. Neo-adjuvant therapy was received by 16.0% of patients (91/567), most of whom (66/91; 72.5%) received CT alone. Adjuvant therapy, either endocrine and/or chemotherapy, was received by 92.6% (525/567) of patients and by 67.0% (61/91) of those who received neo-adjuvant therapy. Most (428/525, 81.5%) received ET in the adjuvant treatment setting.

conclusionsHigh grade tumors predicted high Ki-67 (≥20%) expression, but Ki-67 testing was not widely used in these US patients. Most HR+, HER2- early breast cancers were treated with adjuvant ET, with or without CT.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorChemotherapy, AdjuvantErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleHumansKi-67 AntigenMaleReceptors, ProgesteroneRetrospective StudiesUnited StatesBiomarkers, TumorErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesKi-67 AntigenReceptors, ProgesteroneBreast neoplasmDiagnostic testEarly breast cancerHR+ breast cancerKi-67Ki-67 indexRetrospective studyTreatment pattern

Identifiers

PMID35524219
PMCPMC9074265
OpenAlexW4229028899

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.