ArticleBMC cancer2022
Study protocol comparing the ethical, psychological and socio-economic impact of personalised breast cancer screening to that of standard screening in the "My Personal Breast Screening" (MyPeBS) randomised clinical trial.
Article in BMC cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03672331 (International Randomized Study Comparing Personalized, Risk-Stratified to Standard Breast Cancer Screening In Women Aged 40-70), which is not on this map. Cited by 69 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
International Randomized Study Comparing Personalized, Risk-Stratified to Standard Breast Cancer Screening In Women Aged 40-70
Who cites it
69 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 96 citations in OpenAlex.
- Artificial intelligence for risk-stratified breast cancer screening: a systematic review of evidence, clinical integration, and ethical implications in risk assessment tools.La Radiologia medica · 2026Pooled it
- Weighing the evidence on costs and benefits of polygenic risk-based approaches in clinical practice: A systematic review of economic evaluations.American journal of human genetics · 2025Pooled it
- ESR Essentials: screening for breast cancer - general recommendations by EUSOBI.European radiology · 2024Guideline
- Pooled it
- Risk Stratified Breast Cancer Screening: Early Outcomes and Psychological Impact from PRSONAL - a Randomized Clinical Trial.Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland) · 2026Trial
- Acceptability of de-intensified screening for women at low risk of breast cancer: a randomised online experimental survey.BMC cancer · 2024Trial
- Psychological impact of risk-stratified screening as part of the NHS Breast Screening Programme: multi-site non-randomised comparison of BC-Predict versus usual screening (NCT04359420).British journal of cancer · 2023Trial
- Risk-based breast cancer screening.British journal of cancer · 2026Article
- Real-World Evidence for Breast Cancer Risk Stratification: Insights from the P.I.N.K. Study.Cancers · 2026Article
- MuSTAF: Clinically Relevant Multi-task Spatiotemporal Attention Fusion Framework for Breast Cancer Detection with Longitudinal Mammography.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- The DeepJoint Algorithm: An Innovative Approach for Studying the Longitudinal Evolution of Quantitative Mammographic Density and Its Association With Screen-Detected Breast Cancer Risk.Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift · 2026Article
- WISDOM randomized trial comparing risk-based versus annual breast cancer screening: study cohort characteristics and design.NPJ breast cancer · 2026Article
- Article
- Perspectives from a multi-stakeholder workshop for implementing a risk-stratified breast cancer screening program in Canada.Communications medicine · 2026Review
- From targeted to genome-wide DNA testing in public health screening programs-an introduction to the special issue of the European Journal of Human Genetics.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2026Article
- Underserved Latinas' Perceptions and Implications Around Breast Cancer Risk Assessment.Cancer medicine · 2026Article
- A clinical pilot study for personalized risk-based breast cancer screening utilizing a polygenic risk score.PloS one · 2026Article
- Breast cancer risk prediction with a modified BOADICEA model in Danish women.British journal of cancer · 2026Article
- Article
- Implementing polygenic risk-based breast cancer screening across European health systems: insights from the BRIGHT project.Frontiers in health services · 2026Article
9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors at 13 institutions in 6 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe MyPeBS study is an ongoing randomised controlled trial testing whether a risk-stratified breast cancer screening strategy is non-inferior, or eventually superior, to standard age-based screening at reducing incidence of stage 2 or more cancers. This large European Commission-funded initiative aims to include 85,000 women aged 40 to 70 years, without prior breast cancer and not previously identified at high risk in six countries (Belgium, France, Italy, Israel, Spain, UK). A specific work package within MyPeBS examines psychological, socio-economic and ethical aspects of this new screening strategy. It compares women's reported data and outcomes in both trial arms on the following issues: general anxiety, cancer-related worry, understanding of breast cancer screening strategy and information-seeking behaviour, socio-demographic and economic characteristics, quality of life, risk perception, intention to change health-related behaviours, satisfaction with the trial.
methodsAt inclusion, 3-months, 1-year and 4-years, each woman participating in MyPeBS is asked to fill online questionnaires. Descriptive statistics, bivariate analyses, subgroup comparisons and analysis of variations over time will be performed with appropriate tests to assess differences between arms. Multivariate regression models will allow modelling of different patient reported data and outcomes such as comprehension of the information provided, general anxiety or cancer worry, and information seeking behaviour. In addition, a qualitative study (48 semi-structured interviews conducted in France and in the UK with women randomised in the risk-stratified arm), will help further understand participants' acceptability and comprehension of the trial, and their experience of risk assessment. DISCUSSION: Beyond the scientific and medical objectives of this clinical study, it is critical to acknowledge the consequences of such a paradigm shift for women. Indeed, introducing a risk-based screening relying on individual biological differences also implies addressing non-biological differences (e.g. social status or health literacy) from an ethical perspective, to ensure equal access to healthcare. The results of the present study will facilitate making recommendations on implementation at the end of the trial to accompany any potential change in screening strategy.
trial registrationStudy sponsor: UNICANCER. My personalised breast screening (MyPeBS). CLINICALTRIALS: gov (2018) available at: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03672331 Contact: Cécile VISSAC SABATIER, PhD, + 33 (0)1 73 79 77 58 ext + 330,142,114,293, contact@mypebs.eu.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.