Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35524178›Full record

ArticleBMC primary care2022

Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of a short form of the family health scale.

Fei Wang, Yunchou Wu, Xiaonan Sun, Dong Wang, Wai-Kit Ming, Xinying Sun, Yibo Wu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC primary care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Can family health alleviate income-related health disparity in China? A population-based study.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Fei WangState Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China.
Yunchou WuSchool of Philosophy, Anhui University, Hefei, China.
Xiaonan SunSchool of Humanities and Social Sciences, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
Dong WangSchool of Public Health, Shaanxi University of Chinese Medicine, Xianyang, China.
Wai-Kit MingDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Public Health, Jockey Club College of Veterinary Medicine and Life Sciences, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Xinying SunSchool of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, China. xysun@bjmu.edu.cn.
Yibo WuSchool of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, China. bjmuwuyibo@outlook.com.ORCID 0000-0001-9607-313X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWith the release of the Health China Action (2019-2030), family health is receiving increasing attention from experts and scholars. But at present, there is no family health scale in China that involves multidimensional and interdisciplinary commonality.

aimTo translate a Short Form of the Family Health Scale (FHS-SF) and to test the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the FHS-SF.

methodA Short Form of the Family Health Scale was Chinese translated with the consent of the original author. A total of 8912 residents were surveyed in 120 cities across China using a multistage sampling method, with gender, ethnicity, and education level as quota variables. Seven hundred fifty participants were selected to participate in this study, and 44 participants were randomly selected to be retested 1 month later.

resultsThe Cronbach's alpha of the Chinese version of a Short Form the Family Health Scale was 0.83,the Cronbach's alphas of the four subscales ranged from 0.70 to 0.90, the retest reliability of the scale was 0.75, the standardized factor loadings of the validation factor analysis were above 0.50, GFI = 0.98; NFI = 0.97; RFI = 0.95; RMSEA = 0.07, all within acceptable limits.

conclusionThe Chinese version of a Short Form the Family Health Scale has good reliability and validity and can be used to assess the level of family health of Chinese residents.

Indexed as

Family HealthChinaHumansPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesFamily healthPsychometricsReliabilityValidity

Identifiers

PMID35524178
PMCPMC9077878

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.