Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35524175›Full record

ArticleBMC emergency medicine2022

Workplace violence against emergency health care workers: What Strategies do Workers use?

Evelien Spelten, Julia van Vuuren, Peter O'Meara, Brodie Thomas, Mathieu Grenier, Richard Ferron, Jennie Helmer, Gina Agarwal

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC emergency medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
17.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. The Staff Observation Aggression Scale - Revised for Ambulance Services (SOAS-RA).Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Evelien SpeltenViolet Vines Marshman Research Centre, Rural Health School, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia. e.spelten@latrobe.edu.au.
Julia van VuurenViolet Vines Marshman Research Centre, Rural Health School, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.
Peter O'MearaDepartment of Paramedicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Brodie ThomasViolet Vines Marshman Research Centre, Rural Health School, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.
Mathieu GrenierCounty of Renfrew Paramedic Service, Pembroke, Canada.
Richard FerronNiagara Emergency Medical Services, Niagara Region, Niagara, Canada.
Jennie HelmerSchool of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Gina AgarwalDepartment of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
La Trobe University · AUImpact · CAIsland Health · CAMonash University · AURegional Municipality of Niagara · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWorkplace violence by patients and bystanders against health care workers, is a major problem, for workers, organizations, patients, and society. It is estimated to affect up to 95% of health care workers. Emergency health care workers experience very high levels of workplace violence, with one study finding that paramedics had nearly triple the odds of experiencing physical and verbal violence. Many interventions have been developed, ranging from zero-tolerance approaches to engaging with the violent perpetrator. Unfortunately, as a recent Cochrane review showed, there is no evidence that any of these interventions work in reducing or minimizing violence. To design better interventions to prevent and minimize workplace violence, more information is needed on those strategies emergency health care workers currently use to prevent or minimize violence. The objective of the study was to identify and discuss strategies used by prehospital emergency health care workers, in response to violence and aggression from patients and bystanders. Mapping the strategies used and their perceived usefulness will inform the development of tailored interventions to reduce the risk of serious harm to health care workers. In this study the following research questions were addressed: (1) What strategies do prehospital emergency health care workers utilize against workplace violence from patients or bystanders? (2) What is their experience with these strategies?

methodsFive focus groups with paramedics and dispatchers were held at different urban and rural locations in Canada. The focus group responses were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using thematic analysis.

resultsIt became apparent that emergency healthcare workers use a variety of strategies when dealing with violent patients or bystanders. Most strategies, other than generic de-escalation techniques, reflect a reliance on the systems the workers work with and within.

conclusionThe study results support the move away from focusing on the individual worker, who is the victim, to a systems-based approach to help reduce and minimize violence against health care workers. For this to be effective, system-based strategies need to be implemented and supported in healthcare organizations and legitimized through professional bodies, unions, public policies, and regulations.

Indexed as

Workplace ViolenceAggressionAllied Health PersonnelHealth PersonnelHumansWorkplaceEmergency Medical ServicesOccupational healthParamedicineViolenceWorkplace violence

Identifiers

PMID35524175
PMCPMC9074314
OpenAlexW4229041188

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.