Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35524012›Full record

ArticleArchives of microbiology2022

Flavobacterium hungaricum sp. nov. a novel soil inhabitant, cellulolytic bacterium isolated from plough field.

Rózsa Máté, József Kutasi, Ildikó Bata-Vidács, Judit Kosztik, József Kukolya, Erika Tóth, Károly Bóka, András Táncsics, Gábor Kovács, István Nagy and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Journal of microbiology and biotechnology · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Journal of microbiology and biotechnology · 2024
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Rózsa MátéBioFil Microbiological, Biotechnological and Biochemical Ltd, Budapest, Hungary.
József KutasiBioFil Microbiological, Biotechnological and Biochemical Ltd, Budapest, Hungary.
Ildikó Bata-VidácsResearch Group for Food Biotechnology, Institute of Food Science and Technology, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Budapest, Hungary.
Judit KosztikResearch Group for Food Biotechnology, Institute of Food Science and Technology, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Budapest, Hungary.
József KukolyaResearch Group for Food Biotechnology, Institute of Food Science and Technology, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Budapest, Hungary.
Erika TóthDepartment of Microbiology, Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary.
Károly BókaDepartment of Plant Anatomy, Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary.
András TáncsicsDepartment of Molecular Ecology, Institute of Aquaculture and Environmental Safety, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Gödöllő, Hungary.
Gábor KovácsSeqOmics Biotechnology Ltd., Mórahalom, Hungary.
István NagySeqOmics Biotechnology Ltd., Mórahalom, Hungary.
Ákos TóthResearch Group for Food Biotechnology, Institute of Food Science and Technology, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Budapest, Hungary. Toth.Akos.Gergely@uni-mate.hu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1204-8119
Magyar Agrár- és Élettudományi Egyetem · HUEötvös Loránd University · HUHUN-REN Szegedi Biológiai Kutatóközpont · HUSeqOmics Biotechnology (Hungary) · HU

Funding

Magyar Tudományos Akadémia BO/00342/18Nemzeti Kutatási, Fejlesztési és Innovaciós Alap KFI_16-1-2016-0214Nemzeti Kutatási, Fejlesztési és Innovaciós Alap NVKP_16-1-2016-0009
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A Gram-negative bacterial strain, named Kb82, was isolated from agricultural soil and a polyphasic approach was used for characterisation and to determine its taxonomic position. Based on 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis, the highest similarity was found with Flavobacterium artemisiae SYP-B1015 (98.2%). The highest ANI (83.3%) and dDDH (26.5%) values were found with Flavobacterium ginsenosidimutans THG 01 and Flavobacterium fluviale HYN0086

Indexed as

FlavobacteriumSoilBacterial Typing TechniquesDNA, BacterialFatty AcidsPhylogenyRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSequence Analysis, DNASoil MicrobiologyVitamin K 2DNA, BacterialFatty AcidsRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSoilVitamin K 2BacteroidetesCellulolyticFlavobacteriumglycoside hydrolaseNew taxa

Identifiers

PMID35524012
PMCPMC9076710
OpenAlexW4229046856

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.