Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35523972›Full record

SynthesisArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery2023

Is there any clinical advantage of capsular repair over capsular resection for total hip arthroplasty? An updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

Naomi Kobayashi, Emi Kamono, Kensuke Kameda, Yohei Yukizawa, Shu Takagawa, Hideki Honda, Yutaka Inaba

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. [Advances in study of surgical approaches and MRI evaluation of total hip arthroplasty].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2024
    Review
  6. Surgical Approaches in Total Hip Arthroplasty.Journal of orthopaedics and sports medicine · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Naomi KobayashiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Yokohama City University Medical Center, 4-57, Urafune-cho, Minami-ku, Yokohama, Japan. naomik58@aol.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2419-0860
Emi KamonoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Yokohama City University Medical Center, 4-57, Urafune-cho, Minami-ku, Yokohama, Japan.
Kensuke KamedaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Yokohama City University Medical Center, 4-57, Urafune-cho, Minami-ku, Yokohama, Japan.
Yohei YukizawaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Yokohama City University Medical Center, 4-57, Urafune-cho, Minami-ku, Yokohama, Japan.
Shu TakagawaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Yokohama City University Medical Center, 4-57, Urafune-cho, Minami-ku, Yokohama, Japan.
Hideki HondaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Yokohama City University Medical Center, 4-57, Urafune-cho, Minami-ku, Yokohama, Japan.
Yutaka InabaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Yokohama City University, Yokohama, Japan.
Yokohama City University Medical Center · JPYokohama City University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAlthough several surgical approaches, with or without capsular repair, can be used during total hip arthroplasty (THA), there is no clear evidence that capsular repair provides a clinical advantage post-surgery, regardless of surgical approach. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated whether capsular repair using various surgical approaches provides a clinical advantage over capsular resection post-THA.

methodsThis study was conducted in accordance with the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) 2020 checklist for systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Multiple comprehensive literature searches were performed. Results were summarized qualitatively as meta-analysis of pooled odds ratios, and the standardized mean difference, with 95% confidence intervals for each group: capsular repair or capsular resection. A P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Each study was evaluated for the risk of bias. Publication bias was also assessed.

resultsA total of 12 studies were included after screening and eligibility assessment. The odds ratio for hip dislocation after capsular repair was 0.14 (P < 0.00001). The standard mean difference of the Harris Hip Score (HHS) after capsular repair was 1.11 (P = 0.02). There were no significant differences between groups with respect to operation time (P = 0.79) and blood loss (P = 0.42).

conclusionThe current meta-analysis suggests that capsular repair leads to lower dislocation rates and a better HHS after THA.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, HipHip DislocationJoint DislocationsHumansReoperationCapsular repairCapsular resectionDislocationMeta-analysisSystematic reviewTotal hip arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID35523972
OpenAlexW4229079079

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.