Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35523959›Full record

ArticleThe ISME journal2022

Identification of beneficial and detrimental bacteria impacting sorghum responses to drought using multi-scale and multi-system microbiome comparisons.

Mingsheng Qi, Jeffrey C Berry, Kira M Veley, Lily O'Connor, Omri M Finkel, Isai Salas-González, Molly Kuhs, Julietta Jupe, Emily Holcomb, Tijana Glavina Del Rio and 6 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The ISME journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 42 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
20.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 85 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Thermal imaging as a tool for studying circadian rhythms in roots.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. One Health, One Microbiome.Microbiome · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Microbial drivers of root plasticity.The New phytologist · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Mingsheng QiDonald Danforth Plant Science Center, St. Louis, MO, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2448-1227
Jeffrey C BerryDonald Danforth Plant Science Center, St. Louis, MO, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8064-9787
Kira M VeleyDonald Danforth Plant Science Center, St. Louis, MO, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3109-5810
Lily O'ConnorDonald Danforth Plant Science Center, St. Louis, MO, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4337-3582
Omri M FinkelDepartment of Biology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4770-0402
Isai Salas-GonzálezDepartment of Biology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0347-5058
Molly KuhsDonald Danforth Plant Science Center, St. Louis, MO, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5063-5694
Julietta JupeDonald Danforth Plant Science Center, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Emily HolcombDonald Danforth Plant Science Center, St. Louis, MO, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1392-6438
Tijana Glavina Del RioDOE Joint Genome Institute, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Cody CreechDepartment of Agronomy and Horticulture, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5334-4814
Peng LiuDepartment of Statistics, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2093-8018
Susannah G TringeDOE Joint Genome Institute, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6479-8427
Jeffery L DanglDepartment of Biology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3199-8654
Daniel P SchachtmanDepartment of Agronomy and Horticulture, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1807-4369
Rebecca S BartDonald Danforth Plant Science Center, St. Louis, MO, USA. rbart@danforthcenter.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1378-3481
Donald Danforth Plant Science Center · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USLawrence Berkeley National Laboratory · USUniversity of Nebraska–Lincoln · USIowa State University · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

Designing robust synthetic microbiota for increasing plant productivityF32GM117758 · NIGMS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI FINKEL, OMRI M · 2016 to 2017
$115k
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNIGMS NIH HHS F32 GM117758NSF | Directorate for Biological Sciences (BIO) IOS-1917270U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) DE-AC02-05CH11231U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) DE-SC0014395
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drought is a major abiotic stress limiting agricultural productivity. Previous field-level experiments have demonstrated that drought decreases microbiome diversity in the root and rhizosphere. How these changes ultimately affect plant health remains elusive. Toward this end, we combined reductionist, transitional and ecological approaches, applied to the staple cereal crop sorghum to identify key root-associated microbes that robustly affect drought-stressed plant phenotypes. Fifty-three Arabidopsis-associated bacteria were applied to sorghum seeds and their effect on root growth was monitored. Two Arthrobacter strains caused root growth inhibition (RGI) in Arabidopsis and sorghum. In the context of synthetic communities, Variovorax strains were able to protect plants from Arthrobacter-caused RGI. As a transitional system, high-throughput phenotyping was used to test the synthetic communities. During drought stress, plants colonized by Arthrobacter had reduced growth and leaf water content. Plants colonized by both Arthrobacter and Variovorax performed as well or better than control plants. In parallel, we performed a field trial wherein sorghum was evaluated across drought conditions. By incorporating data on soil properties into the microbiome analysis, we accounted for experimental noise with a novel method and were able to observe the negative correlation between the abundance of Arthrobacter and plant growth. Having validated this approach, we cross-referenced datasets from the high-throughput phenotyping and field experiments and report a list of bacteria with high confidence that positively associated with plant growth under drought stress. In conclusion, a three-tiered experimental system successfully spanned the lab-to-field gap and identified beneficial and deleterious bacterial strains for sorghum under drought.

Indexed as

ArabidopsisMicrobiotaSorghumBacteriaDroughtsEdible GrainPlant Roots

Identifiers

PMID35523959
PMCPMC9296637
OpenAlexW4229081449

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.