Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35523950›Full record

ArticleHeredity2022

Genomic prediction of cotton fibre quality and yield traits using Bayesian regression methods.

Zitong Li, Shiming Liu, Warren Conaty, Qian-Hao Zhu, Philippe Moncuquet, Warwick Stiller, Iain Wilson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heredity, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Bayesian neural networks for genomic prediction: uncertainty quantification and SNP interpretation with SHAP and GWAS.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Zitong LiCSIRO Agriculture & Food, GPO Box 1600, Canberra, ACT, 2601, Australia. Zitong.Li@csiro.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8469-7295
Shiming LiuCSIRO Agriculture & Food, Locked Bag 59, Narrabri, NSW, 2390, Australia.
Warren ConatyCSIRO Agriculture & Food, Locked Bag 59, Narrabri, NSW, 2390, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1278-153X
Qian-Hao ZhuCSIRO Agriculture & Food, GPO Box 1600, Canberra, ACT, 2601, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6505-7417
Philippe MoncuquetCSIRO Agriculture & Food, GPO Box 1600, Canberra, ACT, 2601, Australia.
Warwick StillerCSIRO Agriculture & Food, Locked Bag 59, Narrabri, NSW, 2390, Australia.
Iain WilsonCSIRO Agriculture & Food, GPO Box 1600, Canberra, ACT, 2601, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4626-8059

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genomic selection or genomic prediction (GP) has increasingly become an important molecular breeding technology for crop improvement. GP aims to utilise genome-wide marker data to predict genomic breeding value for traits of economic importance. Though GP studies have been widely conducted in various crop species such as wheat and maize, its application in cotton, an essential renewable textile fibre crop, is still significantly underdeveloped. We aim to develop a new GP-based breeding system that can improve the efficiency of our cotton breeding program. This article presents a GP study on cotton fibre quality and yield traits using 1385 breeding lines from the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO, Australia) cotton breeding program which were genotyped using a high-density SNP chip that generated 12,296 informative SNPs. The aim of this study was twofold: (1) to identify the models and data sources (i.e. genomic and pedigree) that produce the highest prediction accuracies; and (2) to assess the effectiveness of GP as a selection tool in the CSIRO cotton breeding program. The prediction analyses were conducted under various scenarios using different Bayesian predictive models. Results highlighted that the model combining genomic and pedigree information resulted in the best cross validated prediction accuracies: 0.76 for fibre length, 0.65 for fibre strength, and 0.64 for lint yield. Overall, this work represents the largest scale genomic selection studies based on cotton breeding trial data. Prediction accuracies reported in our study indicate the potential of GP as a breeding tool for cotton. The study highlighted the importance of incorporating pedigree and environmental factors in GP models to optimise the prediction performance.

Indexed as

Cotton FiberGenome, PlantBayes TheoremGenomicsGenotypeModels, GeneticPhenotypePlant BreedingPolymorphism, Single Nucleotide

Identifiers

PMID35523950
PMCPMC9338257

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.