ArticleOdontology2022
Vertical root fracture resistance and crack formation of root canal-treated teeth restored with different post-luting systems.
Article in Odontology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Development of a nomogram to predict 5-year tooth loss after root canal treatment in patients with cracked teeth and chronic irreversible pulpitis.Acta odontologica Scandinavica · 2026Article
- Fracture resistance of maxillary lateral incisors: effects of fiber post dimensions, material, and surface treatment.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Optical Coherence Tomography for Detection of Dental Cracks and Vertical Root Fracture: A Scoping Review.Clinical and experimental dental research · 2026Article
- Clinical Observations on Postless Fiber-Reinforced Composite Restorations in Endodontically Treated Teeth with Immediate Pre-Endodontic Dentin Sealing and an Internal Adhesive Ferrule: A Case Series.Dentistry journal · 2026Article
- Simulation of the Periodontal Ligament in Dental Materials Research: A CAD/CAM-Based Method for PDL Modeling.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Article
- Micro-CT Comparative Assessment of Quartz Fiber Hollow and Solid Posts for the Restoration of Endodontically Treated Teeth.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Article
- Ex vivo investigation on the effect of minimally invasive endodontic treatment on vertical root fracture resistance and crack formation.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- In Vitro Evaluation of Lithium Disilicate Endocrowns and Post and Core Crowns-A Systematic Review.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2023Review
- Reinforcement potential of Bioceramic vs. Resin sealers against vertical root fracture risk in the presence of the Butterfly Effect.Journal of oral biology and craniofacial researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim was to investigate the vertical root fracture (VRF) resistance and crack formation of root canal-treated teeth restored with different post-luting systems. Human maxillary lateral incisors of similar size were decoronated, assigned to five groups (n = 18, power = 0.9) and embedded in acrylic blocks with artificial periodontal ligament. After root canal filling, post spaces were prepared to place coated fiber-reinforced composite (FRC) or sandblasted titanium (Ti) posts of the same shape and size. Half of the posts were zinc phosphate cemented (C), while the other half was adhesively luted (A). Untreated teeth served as control. After thermal cycling and staircase loading in a chewing simulator, the crack formation on the root dentin surface was microscopically examined and classified as no defect, craze line, vertical crack, and horizontal crack. Subsequently, the samples were loaded until root fracture. Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA, Tukey's test, and Fisher's exact test. All samples survived the chewing simulation without VRF, but crack formation was significantly different between the groups (P = 0.009). The control showed significantly fewer defects than FRC/C, Ti/C, and Ti/A (P = 0.001, P = 0.008, P = 0.008, respectively). FRC/C showed the highest incidence of vertical cracks. FRC/A had the lowest incidence of defects. There was no significant difference in VRF resistance between the groups (P = 0.265). Adhesively luted FRC posts did not increase VRF resistance but reduced the risk of defects. Most defects were craze lines and vertical root cracks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.