Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35523840›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Spatial distribution and identification of potential risk regions to rice blast disease in different rice ecosystems of Karnataka.

Chittaragi Amoghavarsha, Devanna Pramesh, Shankarappa Sridhara, Balanagouda Patil, Sandip Shil, Ganesha R Naik, Manjunath K Naik, Shadi Shokralla, Ahmed M El-Sabrout, Eman A Mahmoud and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Chittaragi AmoghavarshaDepartment of Plant Pathology, University of Agricultural and Horticultural Sciences, Shivamogga, Karnataka, India.
Devanna PrameshRice Pathology Laboratory, All India Coordinated Rice Improvement Programme, University of Agricultural Sciences, Raichur, Karnataka, India. parmi.iari@gmail.com.
Shankarappa SridharaCenter for Climate Resilient Agriculture, University of Agricultural and Horticultural Sciences, Shivamogga, Karnataka, India.
Balanagouda PatilDepartment of Plant Pathology, University of Agricultural and Horticultural Sciences, Shivamogga, Karnataka, India.
Sandip ShilDivision of Social Sciences, Research Centre, ICAR-Central Plantation Crops Research Institute, Mohitnagar, Jalpaiguri, West Bengal, India. sandip.iasri@gmail.com.
Ganesha R NaikDepartment of Plant Pathology, University of Agricultural and Horticultural Sciences, Shivamogga, Karnataka, India.
Manjunath K NaikDepartment of Plant Pathology, University of Agricultural and Horticultural Sciences, Shivamogga, Karnataka, India.
Shadi ShokrallaCentre for Biodiversity Genomics, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, N1G 2W1, Canada.
Ahmed M El-SabroutDepartment of Applied Entomology and Zoology, Faculty of Agriculture (El-Shatby), Alexandria University, Alexandria, 21545, Egypt.
Eman A MahmoudDepartment of Food Industries, Faculty of Agriculture, Damietta University, Damietta, Egypt.
Hosam O ElansaryPlant Production Department, College of Food and Agriculture Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, 11451, Saudi Arabia.
Anusha NayakRice Pathology Laboratory, All India Coordinated Rice Improvement Programme, University of Agricultural Sciences, Raichur, Karnataka, India.
Muthukapalli K PrasannakumarDepartment of Plant Pathology, College of Agriculture, GKVK, University of Agricultural Sciences, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rice is a globally important crop and highly vulnerable to rice blast disease (RBD). We studied the spatial distribution of RBD by considering the 2-year exploratory data from 120 sampling sites over varied rice ecosystems of Karnataka, India. Point pattern and surface interpolation analyses were performed to identify the spatial distribution of RBD. The spatial clusters of RBD were generated by spatial autocorrelation and Ripley's K function. Further, inverse distance weighting (IDW), ordinary kriging (OK), and indicator kriging (IK) approaches were utilized to generate spatial maps by predicting the values at unvisited locations using neighboring observations. Hierarchical cluster analysis using the average linkage method identified two main clusters of RBD severity. From the Local Moran's I, most of the districts were clustered together (at I > 0), except the coastal and interior districts (at I < 0). Positive spatial dependency was observed in the Coastal, Hilly, Bhadra, and Upper Krishna Project ecosystems (p > 0.05), while Tungabhadra and Kaveri ecosystem districts were clustered together at p < 0.05. From the kriging, Hilly ecosystem, middle and southern parts of Karnataka were found vulnerable to RBD. This is the first intensive study in India on understanding the spatial distribution of RBD using geostatistical approaches, and the findings from this study help in setting up ecosystem-specific management strategies against RBD.

Indexed as

EcosystemCluster AnalysisIndiaSpatial Analysis

Identifiers

PMID35523840
PMCPMC9076900

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.