Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35523806›Full record

ArticleNature communications2022

Stress-induced protein disaggregation in the endoplasmic reticulum catalysed by BiP.

Eduardo Pinho Melo, Tasuku Konno, Ilaria Farace, Mosab Ali Awadelkareem, Lise R Skov, Fernando Teodoro, Teresa P Sancho, Adrienne W Paton, James C Paton, Matthew Fares and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Effect of temperature and nucleotide on the binding of BiP chaperone to a protein substrate.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Eduardo Pinho MeloDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, UK Dementia Research Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. emelo@ualg.pt.ORCID 0000-0002-0974-8977
Tasuku KonnoDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, UK Dementia Research Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4983-5805
Ilaria FaraceDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, UK Dementia Research Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Mosab Ali AwadelkareemDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, UK Dementia Research Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6898-6310
Lise R SkovDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, UK Dementia Research Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7142-7728
Fernando TeodoroCCMAR-Centro de Ciências do Mar, Universidade do Algarve, Campus de Gambelas, Faro, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-5384-1469
Teresa P SanchoCCMAR-Centro de Ciências do Mar, Universidade do Algarve, Campus de Gambelas, Faro, Portugal.
Adrienne W PatonResearch Centre for Infectious Diseases, Department of Molecular and Biomedical Science, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
James C PatonResearch Centre for Infectious Diseases, Department of Molecular and Biomedical Science, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9807-5278
Matthew FaresDepartment of Chemistry, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, State College, PA, USA.
Pedro M R PauloCentro de Química Estrutural, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Av. Rovisco Pais, Lisboa, Portugal.
Xin ZhangDepartment of Chemistry, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, State College, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6686-1645
Edward AvezovDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, UK Dementia Research Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. ea347@cam.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-2894-0585
University of Cambridge · GBPennsylvania State University · USThe University of Adelaide · AUUniversity of Algarve · PTUniversity of Lisbon · PT

Funding

Medical Research Council
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protein synthesis is supported by cellular machineries that ensure polypeptides fold to their native conformation, whilst eliminating misfolded, aggregation prone species. Protein aggregation underlies pathologies including neurodegeneration. Aggregates' formation is antagonised by molecular chaperones, with cytoplasmic machinery resolving insoluble protein aggregates. However, it is unknown whether an analogous disaggregation system exists in the Endoplasmic Reticulum (ER) where ~30% of the proteome is synthesised. Here we show that the ER of a variety of mammalian cell types, including neurons, is endowed with the capability to resolve protein aggregates under stress. Utilising a purpose-developed protein aggregation probing system with a sub-organellar resolution, we observe steady-state aggregate accumulation in the ER. Pharmacological induction of ER stress does not augment aggregates, but rather stimulate their clearance within hours. We show that this dissagregation activity is catalysed by the stress-responsive ER molecular chaperone - BiP. This work reveals a hitherto unknow, non-redundant strand of the proteostasis-restorative ER stress response.

Indexed as

Endoplasmic ReticulumProtein AggregatesAnimalsEndoplasmic Reticulum Chaperone BiPEndoplasmic Reticulum StressMammalsMolecular ChaperonesEndoplasmic Reticulum Chaperone BiPMolecular ChaperonesProtein Aggregates

Identifiers

PMID35523806
PMCPMC9076838
OpenAlexW4229009478

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.