Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35523708›Full record

Observational studyReproductive biomedicine online2022

COVID-19 disease does not cause ovarian injury in women of reproductive age: an observational before-and-after COVID-19 study.

Ilknur Col Madendag, Yusuf Madendag, Ayse Turunc Ozdemir

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · bronzeAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Reproductive biomedicine online, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05685966 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Retrospective Study of COVID-19 on Reproductive Function and Assisted Reproductive Technology Pregnancy Outcome in China

TypeobservationalSponsorJinling Hospital, ChinaRan2023 to 2024Enrolled400ConditionsCOVID-19Armsno intervention
NCT05685992 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

The Effects and Underlying Mechanisms of Novel Coronavirus Infection on Reproductive Function and Assisted Pregnancy Outcome

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorJinling Hospital, ChinaRan2023 to 2024Enrolled400ConditionsCOVID-19 InfectionArmsno intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. SARS-CoV-2, fertility and assisted reproduction.Human reproduction update · 2023
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ilknur Col MadendagDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Health Sciences University, Kayseri Medical Faculty City Hospital Kayseri, Turkey. Electronic address: ilknurmadendag@gmail.com.
Yusuf MadendagDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Erciyes University Medicine Faculty Kayseri, Turkey.
Ayse Turunc OzdemirDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Health Sciences University, Kayseri Medical Faculty City Hospital Kayseri, Turkey.
Kayseri Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi · TRErciyes University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

research questionCan the SARS-CoV-2 virus injure the ovaries?

designAn observational before-and-after COVID-19 study at an academic medical centre. A total of 132 young women aged 18-40 were enrolled; they were tested for reproductive function in the early follicular phase, and their information was obtained from hospital data between January 2019 and June 2021. Serum FSH, LH, oestradiol, the ratio of FSH to LH and anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) concentrations were measured for each patient both before and after COVID-19 disease.

resultsIn women with unexplained infertility, the median serum AMH concentrations (and ranges) were 2.01 ng/ml (1.09-3.78) and 1.74 ng/ml (0.88-3.41) in the pre-COVID-19 disease and post-COVID-19 disease groups, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in terms of serum concentrations of AMH between pre- and post-illness (P = 0.097). Serum FSH, LH, FSH/LH ratio and oestradiol concentrations of the patients before COVID-19 illness were similar to the serum concentrations of the same patients after COVID-19 illness.

conclusionAccording to these study results and recent studies investigating the effect of COVID-19 on ovarian reserve, it is suggested that the SARS-CoV-2 virus does not impact ovarian reserve; however, menstrual status changes may be related to extreme immune response and inflammation, or psychological stress and anxiety caused by the COVID-19 disease. These menstrual status changes are also not permanent and resolve within a few months following COVID-19 illness.

Indexed as

COVID-19Ovarian ReserveAnti-Mullerian HormoneEstradiolFemaleFollicle Stimulating HormoneHumansSARS-CoV-2Anti-Mullerian HormoneEstradiolFollicle Stimulating HormoneCOVID-19 diseaseOvarian injuryOvarian reserveReproductive functionSARS-CoV-2 virus

Identifiers

PMID35523708
PMCPMC8897265
OpenAlexW4220742844

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.