ArticleDiagnostic and interventional imaging2022
4D flow MRI derived aortic hemodynamics multi-year follow-up in repaired coarctation with bicuspid aortic valve.
Article in Diagnostic and interventional imaging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Repaired coarctation of the aorta does not affect four-dimensional flow metrics in bicuspid aortic valve disease.Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery · 2024Article
- Clinical Use of Blood Flow Analysis through 4D-Flow Imaging in Aortic Valve Disease.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2023Review
- Location matters: Offset in tissue-engineered vascular graft implantation location affects wall shear stress in porcine models.JTCVS open · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe purpose of this study was to investigate the relationships between hemodynamic parameters and longitudinal changes in aortic dimensions on four-dimensional (4D) flow magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) and repaired coarctation. MATERIALS AND
methodsThe study retrospectively included patients with BAV and childhood coarctation repair who had at least two cardiothoracic MRI examinations including 4D flow MRI at baseline and follow-up. Analysis included the calculation of aortic peak velocities, wall shear stress (WSS), pulse wave velocity (PWV), aortic dimensions and annual growth rates. Differences between examinations were assessed using paired t-test or Wilcoxon signed rank test. Relationships between growth rate and 4D flow metrics were assessed using Pearson or Spearman correlation tests.
resultsThe cohort included 15 patients (mean age 35 ± 8 [SD] years, 9 men) with a median follow-up time of 3.98 years (Q1: 2.10; Q3: 4.96). There were no significant differences in aortic mean WSS, peak velocities, and PWV between baseline and follow-up values. Greater baseline peak velocities at the site of the coarctation were strongly associated with aortic narrowing (follow-up vs. baseline diameter) at coarctation zone (r = -0.64; P = 0.010) and moderately in descending aorta (r = -0.53; P = 0.042). In addition, increased baseline WSS in the aortic arch was strongly related with narrowing of the coarctation zone at follow-up (r = -0.64, P = 0.011).
conclusionMeasures of aortic hemodynamics and aortic WSS are stable over time in patients with BAV with coarctation repair. Increased peak velocity was associated with a progressive narrowing at the site of the coarctation repair.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.