ArticleBMJ open2022
Evaluating the efficacy and safety of transdermal electrical stimulation on the visual functions of patients with retinitis pigmentosa: a clinical trial protocol for a prospective, multicentre, randomised, double-masked and sham-controlled design (ePICO trial).
Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trial
- Brain-Computer Interfaces for Vision Recovery in Precortical Vision Loss.Eye and brain · 2026Review
- Article
- Efficacy and safety of transdermal electrical stimulation in patients with nonarteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy.Bioelectronic medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPreviously, we conducted a clinical trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of transdermal electrical stimulation (TdES) with skin electrodes to improve the visual functions in patients with retinitis pigmentosa (RP). No adverse events were related to the treatment during follow-up examinations, and TdES significantly improved the mean visual acuity and visual field sensitivity. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We developed a study protocol for a prospective, multicentre, randomised, double-masked and sham-controlled clinical trial, planned to commence on June 2021. We intend to compare the maintenance or improvement in best-corrected visual acuity, and safety of TdES using skin electrodes between patients with RP and the sham group. The primary endpoint comprises the superiority of the logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) visual acuity change at week 24 from baseline in the treatment and sham groups. Secondary endpoints involve the comparison of the treatment and sham groups at week 24 for the logMAR visual acuity, early treatment diabetic retinopathy study visual acuity, the mean deviation value of Humphrey field analyser 10-2, monocular Humphrey Esterman visual field test score, ellipsoid zone length, central foveal thickness and 25-item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire score. We intend to enrol 50 patients from three Japanese institutions within 1 year and follow them up for 1 years. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The protocol was approved by the institutional review board at the Chiba University Hospital and two other institutions, and was registered with the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials on 17 May 2021. The trial will be conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki, and is in accordance with Good Clinical Practice standards. The findings will be published in a peer-reviewed journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: JRCT2032210094.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.