Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35523239›Full record

ArticleJournal of wound, ostomy, and continence nursing : official publication of The Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nurses Society

Use of a Convex Pouching System in the Postoperative Period: A National Consensus.

Janice C Colwell, Janet Stoia Davis, Krisztina Emodi, Jane Fellows, Mary Mahoney, Bethany McDade, Sima Porten, Elizabeth Raskin, Terran Sims, Holly Norman and 2 more

Abstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of wound, ostomy, and continence nursing : official publication of The Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nurses Society. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Stoma Complications.Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Computer-Simulated Model Examining the Effects of Convexity Characteristics at the Skin Barrier- Abdomen Interface.Journal of wound, ostomy, and continence nursing : official publication of The Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nurses Society
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Janice C ColwellJanice C. Colwell, MS, APRN, CWOCN, FAAN, Department of General Surgery, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.
Janet Stoia DavisJanice C. Colwell, MS, APRN, CWOCN, FAAN, Department of General Surgery, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.
Krisztina EmodiJanice C. Colwell, MS, APRN, CWOCN, FAAN, Department of General Surgery, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.
Jane FellowsJanice C. Colwell, MS, APRN, CWOCN, FAAN, Department of General Surgery, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.
Mary MahoneyJanice C. Colwell, MS, APRN, CWOCN, FAAN, Department of General Surgery, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.
Bethany McDadeJanice C. Colwell, MS, APRN, CWOCN, FAAN, Department of General Surgery, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.
Sima PortenJanice C. Colwell, MS, APRN, CWOCN, FAAN, Department of General Surgery, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.
Elizabeth RaskinJanice C. Colwell, MS, APRN, CWOCN, FAAN, Department of General Surgery, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.
Terran SimsJanice C. Colwell, MS, APRN, CWOCN, FAAN, Department of General Surgery, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.
Holly NormanJanice C. Colwell, MS, APRN, CWOCN, FAAN, Department of General Surgery, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.
Matthew T KellyJanice C. Colwell, MS, APRN, CWOCN, FAAN, Department of General Surgery, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.
Mikel GrayJanice C. Colwell, MS, APRN, CWOCN, FAAN, Department of General Surgery, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Convex pouching systems have been available for ostomy patients for decades; however, controversy remains over the use of convexity in the postoperative period. A group of 10 nurses and physicians with expertise caring for patients with an ostomy completed a scoping review identifying research-based evidence and gaps in our knowledge of the safety and effectiveness related to the use of a convex pouching system following ostomy surgery. Results of this scoping review demonstrated the need for a structured consensus to define best practices when selecting a pouching system that provides a secure and reliable seal around the stoma, avoids undermining and leakage of effluent from the pouching system, and contributes to optimal health-related quality of life for patients following ostomy surgery. The expert panel reached consensus on 8 statements for the use of convex products immediately after surgery and throughout the first 6 months after stoma creation, as well as describing goals in choosing the best pouching system for the patient with an ostomy.

Indexed as

OstomySurgical StomasHumansPostoperative PeriodQuality of Life

Identifiers

PMID35523239
PMCPMC9093727

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.