Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35523218›Full record

ArticleEndoscopy2022

Reopenable clip over line method for the closure of full-thickness defect after gastric endoscopic full-thickness resection.

Tatsuma Nomura, Shinya Sugimoto, Haruka Nakamura, Taishi Temma, Jun Oyamada, Keiichi Ito, Makoto Kobayashi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Endoscopy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Twin-grasper assisted mucosal inverted closure achieves complete healing of large perforations after gastric endoscopic full-thickness resection.Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Full-thickness resection closure using reopenable-clip over-the-line method inside a submucosal pocket.VideoGIE : an official video journal of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Tatsuma NomuraDepartment of Gastroenterology, Ise Red Cross Hospital, Ise, Mie, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-1243-8846
Shinya SugimotoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Ise Red Cross Hospital, Ise, Mie, Japan.
Haruka NakamuraDepartment of Gastroenterology, Ise Red Cross Hospital, Ise, Mie, Japan.
Taishi TemmaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Ise Red Cross Hospital, Ise, Mie, Japan.
Jun OyamadaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Ise Red Cross Hospital, Ise, Mie, Japan.
Keiichi ItoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Mie Prefectural Shima Hospital, Shima, Mie, Japan.
Makoto KobayashiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Yokkaichi Municipal Hospital, Yokkaichi, Mie, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Endoscopic Mucosal ResectionGastroscopyHumansStomachSurgical Instruments

Identifiers

PMID35523218
PMCPMC9735295

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.